• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公屋居民对吸烟的看法、戒烟障碍以及吸烟禁令变化。

Public Housing Resident Perspectives on Smoking, Barriers for Smoking Cessation, and Changes in Smoking Mandates.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, 2954Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221092814. doi: 10.1177/00469580221092814.

DOI:10.1177/00469580221092814
PMID:35403482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9006371/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals from low-income groups report disproportionate rates of cigarette use, secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure with increased morbidity and mortality. Smoking bans in public housing have been enacted in attempt to reduce tobacco use and SHS exposure among lower income individuals. This study investigated the support needs of tobacco users living in two public housing complexes in Detroit, Michigan (USA), including their perspectives on smoking, resources and barriers for smoking cessation, and the impact of policy changes.

METHODS

This is a mixed-methods study, using a qualitative focus groups approach and a short survey, public housing residents interview data was analyzed to explore themes related to smoking-related issues. Specifically, six themes were assessed across four focus groups: (1) Quitting Smoking, (2) Current Smoking Cessation Resources, (3) Legal Mandates, (4) Education and Perceptions of Smoking, (5) Community Needs and Barriers, and (6) Medical Experiences.

RESULTS

There were 59 participants; the majority (39/42, 93%) of smokers reported at least one quit attempt. During the focus groups, several participants indicated a desire to quit smoking but reported barriers to smoking cessation, such as lack of access to medications, social triggers to continue smoking, and socioeconomic stressors. A number of suggestions were provided to improve smoking cessation resources, including support groups, graphic images of smoking-related diseased tissue, and better communication with health care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate smoking bans in two public housing complexes can be effective yet are dependent upon a complex set of issues, including numerous barriers to care.

摘要

背景

来自低收入群体的个人报告吸烟率不成比例,二手烟(SHS)暴露率增加,发病率和死亡率增加。为了减少低收入个人的烟草使用和 SHS 暴露,已在公共住房中实施了禁烟令。本研究调查了密歇根州底特律市两个公共住房综合大楼中烟草使用者的支持需求,包括他们对吸烟的看法、戒烟资源和障碍,以及政策变化的影响。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,使用定性焦点小组方法和简短的调查,对公共住房居民访谈数据进行了分析,以探讨与吸烟相关问题的主题。具体来说,在四个焦点小组中评估了六个主题:(1)戒烟,(2)当前戒烟资源,(3)法律授权,(4)教育和吸烟观念,(5)社区需求和障碍,以及(6)医疗经验。

结果

共有 59 名参与者;大多数(39/42,93%)吸烟者报告至少有一次戒烟尝试。在焦点小组中,一些参与者表示有戒烟的愿望,但报告了戒烟的障碍,例如缺乏药物、继续吸烟的社会诱因和社会经济压力。为改善戒烟资源提出了一些建议,包括支持小组、吸烟相关疾病组织的图形图像以及与医疗保健提供者更好地沟通。

结论

这些发现表明,在两个公共住房综合大楼中实施禁烟令可能是有效的,但取决于一系列复杂的问题,包括众多的护理障碍。

相似文献

1
Public Housing Resident Perspectives on Smoking, Barriers for Smoking Cessation, and Changes in Smoking Mandates.公屋居民对吸烟的看法、戒烟障碍以及吸烟禁令变化。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221092814. doi: 10.1177/00469580221092814.
2
Qualitative Assessment of Smoke-Free Policy Implementation in Low-Income Housing: Enhancing Resident Compliance.低收入住房无烟政策实施的定性评估:增强居民遵守情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):107-117. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776090. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Health, Secondhand Smoke Exposure, and Smoking Behavior Impacts of No-Smoking Policies in Public Housing, Colorado, 2014-2015.2014 - 2015年科罗拉多州公共住房禁烟政策对健康、二手烟暴露及吸烟行为的影响
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Oct 20;13:E148. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160008.
4
Perceptions about the Federally Mandated Smoke-Free Housing Policy among Residents Living in Public Housing in New York City.纽约市公租房居民对联邦强制无烟住房政策的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 20;15(10):2062. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102062.
5
Twelve-Month Outcomes of a Group-Randomized Community Health Advocate-Led Smoking Cessation Intervention in Public Housing.社区健康倡导员主导的戒烟干预措施:一项为期 12 个月的群组随机对照试验结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(12):1434-1441. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx193.
6
Smoke-Free or Not: Attitudes Toward Indoor Smoke-Free Policies Among Permanent Supportive Housing Residents.无烟环境与否:永久性支持性住房居民对室内禁烟政策的态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jan;34(1):32-41. doi: 10.1177/0890117119876763. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing.在永久性支持性住房中实施禁烟政策。
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7.
8
Clearing the Air: Smoke-Free Housing Policies, Smoking, and Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Affordable Housing Residents in Minnesota, 2014-2015.净化空气:2014 - 2015年明尼苏达州经济适用房居民的无烟住房政策、吸烟与二手烟暴露情况
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E111. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160195.
9
Alignment of Medical and Psychosocial Sectors for Promotion of Tobacco Cessation among Residents of Public Housing: A Feasibility Study.促进公共住房居民戒烟的医学和心理社会部门的协同作用:一项可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217970.
10
Behavioural intentions in response to a potential menthol cigarette sales ban: a survey examining smokers in Washington, DC public housing.对潜在薄荷醇香烟销售禁令的行为意向:一项在华盛顿特区公共住房中检查吸烟者的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e059821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059821.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth Perceived Benefits and Self-Efficacy Do Not Mediate the Effects of Demographic, Health, and Social Determinants on Telehealth Use of Low-Income African American and Latino Residents of Public Housing in Los Angeles.远程医疗的感知益处和自我效能并未介导人口统计学、健康状况及社会决定因素对洛杉矶公共住房中低收入非裔美国人和拉丁裔居民使用远程医疗的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 31;13(3):286. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030286.
2
Indoor Air Quality in Multi-Family Housing: Drivers and Interventions.多家庭住宅中的室内空气质量:驱动因素与干预措施
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Jan 13;12(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00470-7.
3
Associations of smoke-free policies in multi-unit housing with smoking behavior and second-hand smoke exposure: A systematic review.多单元住房无烟政策与吸烟行为及二手烟暴露的关联:一项系统综述。
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):578-588. doi: 10.1111/add.16724. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
A randomized control trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing.一项支持公共住房禁烟政策合规性的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Aug 22;24(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07339-4.
5
A qualitative study on the influence of COVID-19 on smoking behaviors through changing social and physical contexts.一项关于 COVID-19 通过改变社会和物理环境对吸烟行为影响的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2023 Sep 20;38(5):445-457. doi: 10.1093/her/cyad031.
6
A Randomized Control Trial to support smoke-free policy compliance in public housing.一项支持公共住房无烟政策合规性的随机对照试验。
Res Sq. 2023 Apr 20:rs.3.rs-2701542. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2701542/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
The HUD smoke-free rule: Perceptions of residents post-implementation.住房和城市发展部无烟规定:实施后居民的看法
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jul 9;19:101159. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101159. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Persistent tobacco smoke residue in multiunit housing: Legacy of permissive indoor smoking policies and challenges in the implementation of smoking bans.多单元住宅中的持久性烟草烟雾残留:宽松室内吸烟政策的遗留问题以及实施禁烟令的挑战。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Apr 2;18:101088. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101088. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Qualitative Assessment of Smoke-Free Policy Implementation in Low-Income Housing: Enhancing Resident Compliance.低收入住房无烟政策实施的定性评估:增强居民遵守情况。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):107-117. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776090. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Who's still smoking? Disparities in adult cigarette smoking prevalence in the United States.谁还在吸烟?美国成年人吸烟率的差异。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Mar;68(2):106-115. doi: 10.3322/caac.21444. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing.在永久性支持性住房中实施禁烟政策。
J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0423-7.
6
The Affordable Care Act Reduced Socioeconomic Disparities In Health Care Access.《平价医疗法案》减少了医疗保健获取方面的社会经济差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0083.
7
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Smoking and Smoking Cessation Due to a Smoking Ban: General Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Luxembourg.吸烟及因禁烟导致的戒烟方面的社会经济不平等:卢森堡基于普通人群的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153966. eCollection 2016.
8
Perceived barriers to smoking cessation in selected vulnerable groups: a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative literature.特定弱势群体中戒烟的感知障碍:对定性和定量文献的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 22;4(12):e006414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006414.
9
Individual, social, and environmental factors associated with support for smoke-free housing policies among subsidized multiunit housing tenants.与补贴型多单元住房租户对无烟住房政策支持度相关的个人、社会和环境因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1075-83. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts246. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
10
Deaths from secondhand smoke exposure in the United States: economic implications.美国二手烟暴露导致的死亡:经济影响。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2173-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300805. Epub 2012 Sep 20.