Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍合并型和注意缺陷不伴多动障碍型患儿认知控制的差异。

Differences in cognitive control in children and adolescents with combined and inattentive subtypes of ADHD.

机构信息

a Innlandet Hospital Trust Lillehammer, Division Mental Health Care , Lillehammer , Norway.

出版信息

Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(1):38-48. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2012.741224. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder-combined subtype (ADHD-C) and predominantly inattentive subtype (ADHD-PI) to direct their attention and to exert cognitive control in a forced attention dichotic listening (DL) task. Twenty-nine, medication-naive participants with ADHD-C, 42 with ADHD-PI, and 40 matched healthy controls (HC) between 9 and 16 years were assessed. In the DL task, two different auditory stimuli (syllables) are presented simultaneously, one in each ear. The participants are asked to report the syllable they hear on each trial with no instruction on focus of attention or to explicitly focus attention and to report either the right- or left-ear syllable. The DL procedure is presumed to reflect different cognitive processes: perception (nonforced condition/NF), attention (forced-right condition/FR), and cognitive control (forced-left condition/FL). As expected, all three groups had normal perception and attention. The children and adolescents with ADHD-PI showed a significant right-ear advantage also during the FL condition, while the children and adolescents in the ADHD-C group showed a no-ear advantage and the HC showed a significant left-ear advantage in the FL condition. This suggests that the ADHD subtypes differ in degree of cognitive control impairment. Our results may have implications for further conceptualization, diagnostics, and treatment of ADHD subtypes.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨注意力缺陷多动障碍混合型(ADHD-C)和主要注意力不集中型(ADHD-PI)儿童在强制注意双听(DL)任务中引导注意力和发挥认知控制能力的能力。共有 29 名未经药物治疗的 ADHD-C 患儿、42 名 ADHD-PI 患儿和 40 名年龄在 9 至 16 岁之间的匹配健康对照组(HC)参与了研究。在 DL 任务中,两个不同的听觉刺激(音节)同时呈现,一个在每个耳朵。要求参与者在每个试验中报告他们听到的音节,无需指示注意力焦点,或者明确集中注意力并报告右耳或左耳音节。DL 程序被认为反映了不同的认知过程:感知(非强制条件/NF)、注意力(强制右条件/FR)和认知控制(强制左条件/FL)。正如预期的那样,所有三组的感知和注意力均正常。ADHD-PI 组的儿童和青少年在 FL 条件下也表现出明显的右耳优势,而 ADHD-C 组的儿童和青少年在 FL 条件下表现出无耳优势,而 HC 则表现出明显的左耳优势。这表明 ADHD 亚型在认知控制损伤程度上存在差异。我们的结果可能对 ADHD 亚型的进一步概念化、诊断和治疗具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验