Thoma Samuel
Psychiatr Prax. 2012 Nov;39(8):407-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1305334. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
This article tries to link the present lack of theoretical discussion within German Social Psychiatry with a loss of phenomenological and anthropological thought. The so-called Phenomenological Psychiatry used to play a very important role in German psychiatry during the 50 ies until the 70 ies and had strong influences on the first reformers of German psychiatry, such as Walter Ritter von Baeyer, Heinz Häfner, Caspar Kulenkampff, Karl Peter Kisker and Erich Wulff. Their reforms were not only founded by a social criticism put forth by theories such as marxism (Basaglia, Wulff) or structuralism (Foucault) but also by a concrete notion of what it is like to suffer from mental illness and what kind of needs are linked to such suffering. This very notion was given by the phenomenological approach. Finally the article tries to give reasons for today's reciprocal loss of connection of the phenomenological and the socio-psychiatric school.
本文试图将德国社会精神病学目前缺乏理论探讨的现象与现象学和人类学思想的缺失联系起来。所谓的现象学精神病学在20世纪50年代至70年代期间在德国精神病学中曾发挥非常重要的作用,对德国精神病学的首批改革者产生了重大影响,如沃尔特·里特·冯·拜尔、海因茨·哈夫纳、卡斯帕·库伦坎普夫、卡尔·彼得·基斯克尔和埃里希·伍尔夫。他们的改革不仅基于马克思主义(巴萨利亚、伍尔夫)或结构主义(福柯)等理论提出的社会批判,还基于对患有精神疾病是怎样一种体验以及与这种痛苦相关的需求的具体概念。这一概念正是由现象学方法给出的。最后,本文试图说明当今现象学学派与社会精神病学学派相互失去联系的原因。