• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估手动轮椅使用信心的测量工具(WheelCon-M)第二版:信度和效度。

Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, T325 - 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jan;45(1):61-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1069.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-1069
PMID:23138341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the measurement properties of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for manual wheelchair users version 2.1 (WheelCon-M 2.1).

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteer sample of 83 community-dwelling, experienced manual wheelchair users.

METHODS

Participants completed the WheelCon-M 2.1 twice to assess retest reliability. Validity was assessed by evaluating hypothesized relationships between the WheelCon-M 2.1 and relevant variables. Responsiveness was assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD).

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) WheelCon-M 2.1 score was 84.6 (71.3-92.0) of a possible 0-100. The one-week retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 with 95% bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals of 0.77-0.90. Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. Correlations ranging from rs = -0.19 (p = 0.780) to rs = 0.58 (p < 0.001) were found between the WheelCon-M 2.1 and other relevant outcome measures with all correlations being statistically significant except for age (p = 0.780) and social support (p = 0.057). A statistically significant difference was not found between the sexes (p = 0.140). The SEM and SRM were 5.9 and 16.4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

WheelCon-M 2.1 has high internal consistency, strong retest reliability, and support for concurrent validity, construct validity and responsiveness. This new test holds promise as a clinical and research tool.

摘要

目的

评估改良版手动轮椅使用信心量表(WheelCon-M 2.1)的测量特性。

设计

队列研究。

参与者

社区居住、经验丰富的手动轮椅使用者的志愿者样本,共 83 名。

方法

参与者两次完成 WheelCon-M 2.1 以评估重测信度。通过评估 WheelCon-M 2.1 与相关变量之间的假设关系来评估有效性。使用测量误差(SEM)和最小实际差异(SRD)来评估反应度。

结果

WheelCon-M 2.1 的中位数(四分位距)得分为 84.6(71.3-92.0),满分 100 分。一周后的重测组内相关系数为 0.84,95%置信区间的偏倚校正和加速为 0.77-0.90。克朗巴赫 α系数为 0.92。WheelCon-M 2.1 与其他相关结局测量之间的相关性范围从 rs=-0.19(p=0.780)到 rs=0.58(p<0.001),所有相关性均有统计学意义,除了年龄(p=0.780)和社会支持(p=0.057)。男女之间没有统计学差异(p=0.140)。SEM 和 SRM 分别为 5.9 和 16.4。

结论

WheelCon-M 2.1 具有较高的内部一致性、较强的重测信度,且支持同时有效性、结构有效性和反应度。这个新的测试有望成为一种临床和研究工具。

相似文献

1
Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity.用于评估手动轮椅使用信心的测量工具(WheelCon-M)第二版:信度和效度。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jan;45(1):61-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1069.
2
Measurement properties of the WheelCon for powered wheelchair users.适用于电动轮椅使用者的WheelCon测量属性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Oct;13(7):614-619. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1358301. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
3
French-Canadian translation of the WheelCon-M (WheelCon-M-F) and evaluation of its validity evidence using telephone administration.WheelCon-M的法裔加拿大语翻译版本(WheelCon-M-F)以及使用电话管理方式对其效度证据的评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(9):812-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.941019. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
4
The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form.轮椅使用信心量表:简版的意大利语翻译、改编及验证
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug;13(6):575-580. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1357053. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能测试问卷的测量属性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.984778. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
6
Measurement properties of wheelchair use assessment tools in adults with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay.常染色体隐性痉挛性共济失调型小脑性共济失调成年患者用轮椅评估工具的测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):907-915. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1821104. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
The French-Canadian WheelCon for manual wheelchair users: paediatric adaptation and preliminary evaluation of its measurement properties.面向手动轮椅使用者的法裔加拿大WheelCon:儿科适应性及其测量特性的初步评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Apr 26:1-10. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2203950.
8
Wheelchair Mobility Confidence Scale for Dutch youth using a manual wheelchair.荷兰青年使用手动轮椅的轮椅移动信心量表。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):684-691. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604832. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Measuring wheelchair confidence among power wheelchair users: an adaptation of the WheelCon-M using focus groups and a think aloud process.测量电动轮椅使用者的轮椅信心:采用焦点小组和出声思考法对轮椅信心量表(WheelCon-M)进行改编
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jan;12(1):39-46. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1063018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure.评估、训练和发现轮椅技能的自我效能感(SEATS)结果测量的信度和反应度
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Apr;14(3):250-254. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428370. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Manual Wheelchair Skills Training for Improving Skills and Confidence in People With Hereditary Degenerative Disorders: Protocol for a Sequential Multimethods Study.手动轮椅技能训练对提高遗传性退行性疾病患者技能和信心的疗效:一项序贯多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 31;14:e66974. doi: 10.2196/66974.
2
Wheelchair use confidence scale for Arab pediatric manual wheelchair users: preliminary evaluation of its measurement properties.阿拉伯儿童手动轮椅使用者的轮椅使用信心量表:其测量特性的初步评估。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 27;13:1522475. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1522475. eCollection 2025.
3
Wheeled mobility use outcomes: a systematic review protocol of measurement properties.
轮式移动工具使用结果:测量特性的系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Sep 1;22(9):1898-1905. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00427.
4
Protocol for a single group, mixed methods study investigating the efficacy of photovoice to improve self-efficacy related to balance and falls for spinal cord injury.一项单组混合方法研究的方案,旨在调查摄影疗法对提高脊髓损伤患者与平衡和跌倒相关的自我效能感的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 8;12(12):e065684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065684.
5
Exploring the Influence of a Community-Based Peer-Led Wheelchair Skills Training on Satisfaction with Participation in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy and Spina Bifida: A Pilot Study.探索社区主导的同伴指导轮椅技能训练对脑瘫和脊柱裂儿童和青少年参与满意度的影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11908. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911908.
6
Influence of Cognitive Functioning on Powered Mobility Device Use: Protocol for a Systematic Review.认知功能对动力移动设备使用的影响:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Mar 25;9(3):e16534. doi: 10.2196/16534.
7
Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.开发轮式移动指标以提高脊髓损伤康复质量:SCI-High项目。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):130-140. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647934.
8
Mobility and Participation of People With Disabilities Using Mobility Assistive Technologies: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.使用移动辅助技术的残疾人的移动性与参与度:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(4):e12089. doi: 10.2196/12089.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the "Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale" in the Italian population.“脊髓损伤-跌倒担忧量表”在意大利人群中的跨文化调适与验证
Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):712-718. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0070-6. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Wheelchair services and use outcomes: A cross-sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines.轮椅服务与使用结果:肯尼亚和菲律宾的横断面调查
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Oct 20;6:318. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.318. eCollection 2017.