Suppr超能文献

一种新型便携式石膏浇注振动器:对柱-基台边缘适合性的影响。

A new portable vibrator for plaster pouring: effect on the marginal fit at cylinder-abutment.

机构信息

Department of Implant Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):517-21. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test a new portable vibrator for plaster pouring (developed for this purpose), comparing the effect of its use on the accuracy of working cast of implant-supported restorations to the conventional vibrator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From a master cast with 2 implants, 30 transfer moldings were made randomly and divided into three groups: group I (GI): pouring performed in an outsourced dental laboratory with conventional plaster vibrator (10 casts), group II (GII): pouring performed in the laboratory of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) with conventional plaster vibrator (10 casts) and group III (GIII): pouring performed with the portable vibrator fabricated for this study (10 casts). The position of the analogue and marginal adaptation of the infrastructure were verified by testing the single screw on the master model and on the working model. The measurement of misfit was blindly performed with a precision microscope and analyzing unit, Quadra-Check 200. The data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Holm-Sidak test (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Means±standard deviations were as follows: GI: 19.19±4.73 µm; GII: 21.72±5.41 µm; GIII: 13.5±2.39 µm (P<0.05), with GIII significantly lower as compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that a greater accuracy of working cast was achieved when a portable vibrator was used for casting molds.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试一种新的用于石膏浇注的便携式振动器(为此目的而开发),比较其使用对种植体支持修复体工作模型准确性的影响与传统振动器的影响。

材料与方法

从带有 2 个种植体的母模上,随机制作了 30 个转移模型,并将其分为三组:I 组(GI):在外部牙科实验室使用传统石膏振动器进行浇注(10 个模型);II 组(GII):在圣卡塔琳娜联邦大学(UFSC)的实验室使用传统石膏振动器进行浇注(10 个模型);III 组(GIII):使用为这项研究制作的便携式振动器进行浇注(10 个模型)。通过在母模型和工作模型上测试单螺杆,验证了模拟体和边缘适应性的位置。使用精度显微镜和分析单元(Quadra-Check 200)进行了不匹配的盲测。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和 Holm-Sidak 检验(α=0.05)对数据进行了统计学分析。

结果

平均值±标准偏差如下:GI:19.19±4.73 µm;GII:21.72±5.41 µm;GIII:13.5±2.39 µm(P<0.05),GIII 与其他组相比显著降低。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,得出的结论是,使用便携式振动器浇注模型时,可以获得更高的工作模型准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c87f/3881794/590fbf4e7857/jaos-20-05-0517-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
A new portable vibrator for plaster pouring: effect on the marginal fit at cylinder-abutment.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):517-21. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500004.
4
Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Feb;89(2):186-92. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.15.
6
Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36.
7
Strain gauges's analysis on implant-retained prosthesis' cast accuracy.
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):635-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.147113.
8
Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00046.x.
10
One clinical visit for a multiple implant restoration master cast fabrication.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):550-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70004-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Implant/abutment vertical misfit of one-piece cast frameworks made with different materials.
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(6):515-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000600006.
2
Effect of porcelain-firing cycles and surface finishing on the marginal discrepancy of titanium copings.
J Prosthodont. 2011 Feb;20(2):101-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00668.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
3
Marginal fit at cylinder-abutment interface before and after overcasting procedure.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;13(4):366-71. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000400010.
4
Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May 1;37(5):359-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02063.x. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
7
Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-36.
10
Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):323-31. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70136-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验