Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;13(4):366-71. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000400010.
The aim of this study was to measure marginal fit at cylinder-abutment interface, before and after overcasting procedure. A hexagonal implant was fixed to a stainless steel base and a Estheticone-like abutment used during all the experiment. Before casting procedure, gold (Group I) and Ni-Cr-Be (Group II) premachined cylinders were tightened to the abutment with gold and titanium screws (in both groups), with 10Ncm and 20Ncm torque values for the same screw type. Vertical measures were taken at the light microscope (Mitutoyo 5050, Tokyo, Japan) three times in six different parts along the abutment-cylinder interface for each torque value. Cylinders were overcast with Ag-Pd (Group I) or Ni-Cr-Be (Group II) alloy. After casting, the same measures and torque values were repeated. Intragroup differences (10 or 20Ncm torque values, before and after casting) and intergroup differences (10 and 20Ncm torque values, before or after casting) were analyzed by the Paired t Test; (p<0.05). Intragroup differences were observed for G-I (gold, 20Ncm, titanium screw, p=0.044) and for G-II (Ni-Cr-Be, 10Ncm, gold screw, p=0.002). Intergroup differences only were not observed in the G-II group (Ni-Cr-Be, 10 and 20Ncm, titanium screw, p=0.534). Within the limits of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1) Regardless of screw type, marginal misfit was higher for Ni-Cr-Be cylinders after casting, but within acceptable levels of fit; 2) The combination of gold cylinders with gold or titanium screws was the most effective to reduce marginal misfit; 3) Both screw types did not improve marginal fit of Ni-Cr-Be cylinders after overcastting, and 4) Although a 20Ncm torque improved marginal fit in all situations, its use is not recommended due to the increased risk of prosthesis failure. Ni-Cr-Be alloys may be successfully used in single-tooth implant restorations, with no damage to the fit between abutment and prosthetic cylinder.
本研究旨在测量圆柱体-衔接体界面的边缘适配,分别在铸造前和铸造后进行测量。将一个六角形种植体固定在不锈钢基底上,在整个实验过程中使用类似于 Estheticone 的衔接体。在铸造前,将金(第 I 组)和镍铬铍(第 II 组)预制圆柱体用金和钛螺丝(两组均用)拧紧到衔接体上,对于相同类型的螺丝,扭矩值为 10Ncm 和 20Ncm。使用 Mitutoyo 5050 型显微镜(东京,日本)在六个不同部位的衔接体-圆柱体界面上进行三次垂直测量,每个扭矩值测量三次。用银钯(第 I 组)或镍铬铍(第 II 组)合金进行铸造后覆盖。铸造后,重复相同的测量和扭矩值。用配对 t 检验分析组内差异(铸造前和铸造后 10 或 20Ncm 扭矩值)和组间差异(铸造前和铸造后 10 和 20Ncm 扭矩值);(p<0.05)。观察到第 I 组(金,20Ncm,钛螺丝,p=0.044)和第 II 组(镍铬铍,10Ncm,金螺丝,p=0.002)的组内差异。仅观察到第 II 组(镍铬铍,10 和 20Ncm,钛螺丝,p=0.534)的组间差异。在本研究的限制内,可以得出以下结论:1)无论螺丝类型如何,铸造后镍铬铍圆柱体的边缘不匹配度更高,但仍在可接受的匹配范围内;2)金圆柱体与金或钛螺丝的组合是降低边缘不匹配度最有效的方法;3)两种螺丝类型都不能改善铸造后镍铬铍圆柱体的边缘不匹配度;4)尽管 20Ncm 的扭矩可改善所有情况下的边缘适配,但不建议使用,因为这会增加修复体失效的风险。镍铬铍合金可成功用于单牙种植体修复,不会对衔接体和修复体圆柱体之间的适配造成损害。