Herzog Walter, Tang Conrad, Leonard Tim
Killam Memorial Chair, Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics, Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Professor in Kinesiology, Medicine, Engineering and Veterinary Medicine, Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chiropractor, Human Performance Lab, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Nov-Dec;38(9):664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
The primary objective of this study was to quantify the strains applied to the internal carotid artery (ICA) during neck spinal manipulative treatments and range of motion (ROM)/diagnostic testing of the head and neck.
Strains of the ICA (n = 12) were measured in 6 fresh, unembalmed cadaveric specimens using sonomicrometry. Peak and average strains of the ICA obtained during cervical spinal manipulations given by experienced doctors of chiropractic were compared with the corresponding strains obtained during ROM and diagnostic testing of the head and neck.
Peak and average strains of the ICA for cervical spinal manipulative treatments were significantly smaller (P < .001) than the corresponding strains obtained for the ROM and diagnostic testing. All strains during ROM and treatment testing were dramatically smaller than the initial failure strains of the ICA.
This study showed that maximal ICA strains imparted by cervical spinal manipulative treatments were well within the normal ROM. Chiropractic manipulation of the neck did not cause strains to the ICA in excess of those experienced during normal everyday movements. Therefore, cervical spinal manipulative therapy as performed by the trained clinicians in this study, did not appear to place undue strain on the ICA and thus does not seem to be a factor in ICA injuries.
本研究的主要目的是量化颈部脊柱手法治疗以及头部和颈部活动范围(ROM)/诊断测试期间施加于颈内动脉(ICA)的应变。
使用超声测量法在6个新鲜、未防腐处理的尸体标本中测量ICA的应变(n = 12)。将经验丰富的整脊医生进行颈椎手法治疗时获得的ICA峰值应变和平均应变,与头部和颈部ROM及诊断测试期间获得的相应应变进行比较。
颈椎手法治疗时ICA的峰值应变和平均应变显著小于(P < .001)ROM及诊断测试时获得的相应应变。ROM和治疗测试期间的所有应变均显著小于ICA的初始破坏应变。
本研究表明,颈椎手法治疗施加的ICA最大应变完全在正常ROM范围内。颈部整脊手法操作并未导致ICA产生超过日常正常活动时所经历的应变。因此,本研究中经过培训的临床医生所进行的颈椎手法治疗,似乎并未对ICA施加过度应变,因而似乎不是导致ICA损伤的一个因素。