Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;95(1):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.074. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
Administrative datasets are often used to assess outcomes and quality of pediatric cardiac programs; however their accuracy regarding case ascertainment is unclear. We linked patient data (2004-2010) from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery (STS-CHS) Database (clinical registry) and the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database (administrative database) from hospitals participating in both to evaluate differential coding/classification of operations between datasets and subsequent impact on outcomes assessment.
Eight individual benchmark operations and the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) categories were evaluated. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
The cohort included 59,820 patients from 33 centers. There was a greater than 10% difference in the number of cases identified between data sources for half of the benchmark operations. The negative predictive value (NPV) of the administrative (versus clinical) data was high (98.8%-99.9%); the positive predictive value (PPV) was lower (56.7%-88.0%). Overall agreement between data sources in RACHS-1 category assignment was 68.4%. These differences translated into significant differences in outcomes assessment, ranging from an underestimation of mortality associated with truncus arteriosus repair by 25.7% in the administrative versus clinical data (7.01% versus 9.43%; p = 0.001) to an overestimation of mortality associated with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair by 31.0% (0.78% versus 0.60%; p = 0.1). For the RACHS-1 categories, these ranged from an underestimation of category 5 mortality by 40.5% to an overestimation of category 2 mortality by 12.1%; these differences were not statistically significant.
This study demonstrates differences in case ascertainment between administrative and clinical registry data for children undergoing cardiac operations, which translated into important differences in outcomes assessment.
行政数据集常用于评估儿科心脏计划的结果和质量;然而,它们在病例确定方面的准确性尚不清楚。我们将来自参与这两个数据库的医院的患者数据(2004-2010 年)与胸外科医生协会先天性心脏病手术(STS-CHS)数据库(临床登记处)和儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库(行政数据库)进行了链接,以评估两个数据集之间手术的差异编码/分类以及对结果评估的后续影响。
评估了 8 个单独的基准操作和 1 版风险调整先天性心脏病手术(RACHS-1)类别。主要结果是住院死亡率。
该队列包括来自 33 个中心的 59820 名患者。一半基准操作的病例数在数据源之间存在超过 10%的差异。行政(与临床)数据的阴性预测值(NPV)较高(98.8%-99.9%);阳性预测值(PPV)较低(56.7%-88.0%)。数据来源在 RACHS-1 类别分配上的总体一致性为 68.4%。这些差异导致了结果评估的显著差异,范围从行政数据中动脉干修复的死亡率低估了 25.7%(7.01%比 9.43%;p=0.001)到室间隔缺损(VSD)修复的死亡率高估了 31.0%(0.78%比 0.60%;p=0.1)。对于 RACHS-1 类别,这些差异范围从 5 类死亡率的低估 40.5%到 2 类死亡率的高估 12.1%;这些差异没有统计学意义。
本研究表明,接受心脏手术的儿童的行政和临床登记数据在病例确定方面存在差异,这导致了结果评估的重要差异。