• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效观察及结局预测因素的研究。

Observational study on the efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and predictors of outcome.

机构信息

Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2013 Oct;7(9):717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.10.004
PMID:23142005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on efficacy and predictors of response to adalimumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical practice is limited.

AIM

Assessment of response to adalimumab and its predictors in an observational cohort study.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study based on data obtained from ENEIDA registry. All patients diagnosed with UC treated with adalimumab were included. Response to adalimumab was evaluated at weeks 12, 28, and 54 according to the partial Mayo score, and requirement of colectomy until end of follow-up.

RESULTS

48 patients with UC treated with adalimumab were included; 39 (81.3%) had previously received infliximab. Response rates at weeks 12, 28 and 54 were 70.8%, 43.2% and 35% respectively. Response to prior treatment with infliximab was the only predictive factor of response to adalimumab at week 12, which was obtained in 90% of infliximab remitters, 53.8% of responders and 33.3% of primary non-responders (p=0.01). Colectomy was required in 11 patients (22.9%), after a mean time of 205 days. The only clinical independent predictor of colectomy was non-response to adalimumab at week 12: colectomy rates were 5/34 (14.7%) in responders and 6/14 (42.9%) in non-responders (p=0.035), time free of colectomy was significantly reduced in non-responders (p=0.01). Adalimumab withdrawal due to adverse events occurred in 4.2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that adalimumab is an effective treatment in patients with UC. If used as a second anti-TNF, previous achievement of remission with the first anti-TNF predicts response, and failure to achieve response at week 12 predicts colectomy.

摘要

背景

在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的临床实践中,关于阿达木单抗疗效和应答预测因素的信息有限。

目的

在一项观察性队列研究中评估阿达木单抗的应答及其预测因素。

方法

这是一项基于 ENEIDA 注册中心数据的回顾性队列研究。纳入所有接受阿达木单抗治疗的 UC 患者。根据部分 Mayo 评分,在第 12、28 和 54 周评估阿达木单抗的应答,并在随访结束时评估是否需要结肠切除术。

结果

纳入 48 例接受阿达木单抗治疗的 UC 患者;其中 39 例(81.3%)既往接受过英夫利昔单抗治疗。第 12、28 和 54 周的应答率分别为 70.8%、43.2%和 35%。既往接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的应答是第 12 周对阿达木单抗应答的唯一预测因素,在英夫利昔单抗缓解者、应答者和原发性无应答者中分别获得 90%、53.8%和 33.3%(p=0.01)。11 例(22.9%)患者需要结肠切除术,平均时间为 205 天。第 12 周对阿达木单抗无应答是结肠切除术的唯一独立临床预测因素:应答者的结肠切除术率为 5/34(14.7%),无应答者为 6/14(42.9%)(p=0.035),无应答者的免于结肠切除术时间显著缩短(p=0.01)。由于不良反应,有 4.2%的患者停用阿达木单抗。

结论

本研究表明,阿达木单抗是 UC 患者的有效治疗方法。如果将其用作第二种抗 TNF,首次抗 TNF 获得缓解预示着对阿达木单抗的应答,第 12 周无应答预示着需要结肠切除术。

相似文献

1
Observational study on the efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and predictors of outcome.阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效观察及结局预测因素的研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2013 Oct;7(9):717-22. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
2
Early predictors of colectomy and long-term maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis patients treated using anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy.抗 TNF 治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的结肠切除术和长期缓解维持的早期预测因素。
Intern Med J. 2014 May;44(5):464-70. doi: 10.1111/imj.12397.
3
Efficacy of Adalimumab as a long term maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis.阿达木单抗作为溃疡性结肠炎长期维持治疗的疗效。
J Crohns Colitis. 2013 Mar;7(2):150-3. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
4
Similar Clinical and Surgical Outcomes Achieved with Early Compared to Late Anti-TNF Induction in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.早期与晚期使用抗 TNF 诱导治疗轻中度溃疡性结肠炎的临床和手术结局相似:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2079582. doi: 10.1155/2016/2079582. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis previously treated with infliximab.阿达木单抗诱导和维持治疗对先前接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;33(3):340-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04531.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
6
Clinical outcome of adalimumab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis previously treated with infliximab: a Danish single-center cohort study.阿达木单抗治疗先前接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者的临床结局:一项丹麦单中心队列研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1018-24. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1019558. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Outpatient Ulcerative Colitis Primary Anti-TNF Responders Receiving Adalimumab or Infliximab Maintenance Therapy Have Similar Rates of Secondary Loss of Response.接受阿达木单抗或英夫利昔单抗维持治疗的门诊溃疡性结肠炎原发性抗TNF应答者继发性应答丧失率相似。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;49(8):675-82. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000265.
8
Effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in clinical practice: comparison between anti-tumour necrosis factor-naïve and non-naïve patients.阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床疗效:抗肿瘤坏死因子初治与非初治患者的比较。
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;52(7):788-799. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1274-1. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
Real-life outcome of anti-tumor necrosis factor α in the ambulatory treatment of ulcerative colitis.抗肿瘤坏死因子α在溃疡性结肠炎门诊治疗中的实际疗效
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 21;21(11):3282-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3282.
10
Infliximab three-dose induction regimen in severe corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: early and late outcome and predictors of colectomy.英夫利昔单抗三剂量诱导方案治疗重度糖皮质激素难治性溃疡性结肠炎:早期和晚期结局及结肠切除术的预测因素
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 Aug;8(8):852-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Biologic Therapies in Treating Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生物疗法治疗中重度溃疡性结肠炎的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85923. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Association Between Smoking Status and the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.吸烟状态与托法替布治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的疗效及安全性之间的关联
Crohns Colitis 360. 2024 Jan 20;6(1):otae004. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otae004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Choosing Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis.
溃疡性结肠炎的治疗选择
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 4;7(1):9-21. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad025. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Clinical and treatment outcomes of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with two consecutive anti-TNF agents: data from the ENEIDA registry.接受两种连续抗TNF药物治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者使用第二种皮下或静脉注射抗TNF药物的临床及治疗结局:来自ENEIDA注册研究的数据
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 5;17:17562848231221713. doi: 10.1177/17562848231221713. eCollection 2024.
5
Albumin change predicts failure in ulcerative colitis treated with adalimumab.白蛋白变化可预测阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎的失败。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295681. eCollection 2024.
6
Dose Escalation Patterns of Advanced Therapies in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Literature Review.《克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎中先进疗法的剂量递增模式:系统文献回顾》
Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2051-2081. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02457-6. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
7
Adalimumab, Infliximab, and Vedolizumab in Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Long-Term Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Referral Center.阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和维多珠单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎:在三级转诊中心的长期回顾性研究
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Jul 13;3(4):otab049. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab049. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in Brazil: a comparative real-world national retrospective multicentric study from the Brazilian study group of IBD (GEDIIB).巴西溃疡性结肠炎的抗 TNF 治疗:巴西炎症性肠病研究组(GEDIIB)的一项全国性回顾性真实世界比较多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 May 29;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02341-7.
9
How to Choose the Biologic Therapy in a Bio-naïve Patient with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.如何为初治的炎症性肠病患者选择生物治疗方法。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 4;11(3):829. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030829.
10
Primary Failure to an Anti-TNF Agent in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Switch (to a Second Anti-TNF Agent) or Swap (for Another Mechanism of Action)?炎症性肠病中抗TNF药物的原发性失效:更换(为第二种抗TNF药物)还是替换(为另一种作用机制的药物)?
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 15;10(22):5318. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225318.