Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Colorectal Surgery Unit, University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 May 29;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02341-7.
Anti-TNF therapy represented a landmark in medical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). There is lack of data on the efficacy and safety of these agents in Brazilian patients. The present study aimed to analyze rates of clinical and endoscopic remission comparatively, between adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), in Brazilian patients with UC, and evaluate factors associated with clinical and endoscopic remission after 1 year of treatment.
A national retrospective multicenter study (24 centers) was performed including patients with UC treated with anti-TNF therapy. Outcomes as clinical response and remission, endoscopic remission and secondary loss of response were measured in different time points of the follow-up. Baseline predictive factors of clinical and endoscopic remission at week 52 were evaluated using logistic regression model. Indirect comparisons among groups (ADA and IFX) were performed using Student's t, Pearson χ or Fisher's exact test when appropriated, and Kaplan Meier analysis.
Overall, 393 patients were included (ADA, n = 111; IFX, n = 282). The mean age was 41.86 ± 13.60 years, 61.58% were female, most patients had extensive colitis (62.40%) and 19.39% had previous exposure to a biological agent. Overall, clinical remission rate was 66.78%, 71.62% and 82.82% at weeks 8, 26 and 52, respectively. Remission rates were higher in the IFX group at weeks 26 (75.12% vs. 62.65%, p < 0.0001) and 52 (65.24% vs. 51.35%, p < 0.0001) when compared to ADA. According to Kaplan-Meier survival curve loss of response was less frequent in the Infliximab compared to Adalimumab group (p = 0.001). Overall, endoscopic remission was observed in 50% of patients at week 26 and in 65.98% at week 52, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.114). Colectomy was performed in 23 patients (5.99%). Age, non-prior exposure to biological therapy, use of IFX and endoscopic remission at week 26 were associated with clinical remission after 52 weeks. Variables associated with endoscopic remission were non-prior exposure to biological therapy, and clinical and endoscopic remission at week 26.
IFX was associated with higher rates of clinical remission after 1 year in comparison to ADA. Non-prior exposure to biological therapy and early response to anti-TNF treatment were associated with higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission.
抗 TNF 治疗是溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗的一个里程碑。巴西患者使用这些药物的疗效和安全性数据缺乏。本研究旨在比较阿达木单抗(ADA)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)在巴西 UC 患者中的临床和内镜缓解率,并评估治疗 1 年后与临床和内镜缓解相关的因素。
这是一项全国性回顾性多中心研究(24 个中心),纳入接受抗 TNF 治疗的 UC 患者。在随访的不同时间点测量临床缓解和缓解、内镜缓解和继发缓解丧失等结果。使用逻辑回归模型评估第 52 周时临床和内镜缓解的基线预测因素。当适用时,使用学生 t 检验、皮尔逊 χ 检验或 Fisher 确切检验对组间(ADA 和 IFX)进行间接比较,并进行 Kaplan-Meier 分析。
共纳入 393 例患者(ADA 组 n=111;IFX 组 n=282)。平均年龄为 41.86±13.60 岁,61.58%为女性,大多数患者为广泛性结肠炎(62.40%),19.39%曾使用过生物制剂。总体而言,第 8、26 和 52 周的临床缓解率分别为 66.78%、71.62%和 82.82%。第 26 周(75.12%比 62.65%,p<0.0001)和第 52 周(65.24%比 51.35%,p<0.0001)IFX 组的缓解率更高。根据 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线,与阿达木单抗相比,英夫利昔单抗的无应答率较低(p=0.001)。总体而言,第 26 周时 50%的患者出现内镜缓解,第 52 周时 65.98%的患者出现内镜缓解,两组之间无差异(p=0.114)。23 例患者(5.99%)接受了结肠切除术。年龄、非生物治疗既往暴露、IFX 的使用和第 26 周时的内镜缓解与第 52 周时的临床缓解相关。与内镜缓解相关的变量是非生物治疗的既往暴露,以及第 26 周的临床和内镜缓解。
与 ADA 相比,IFX 在 1 年后的临床缓解率更高。非生物治疗既往暴露和抗 TNF 治疗早期应答与更高的临床和内镜缓解率相关。