Suppr超能文献

再同步化改善了心-动脉偶联,降低了动脉负荷决定因素。

Resynchronization improves heart-arterial coupling reducing arterial load determinants.

机构信息

Physiology Department, Centro Universitario de Investigación, Innovación y Diagnóstico Arterial (CUiiDARTE), School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, General Flores 2125, Montevideo PC: 11800, República Oriental del Uruguay.

出版信息

Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):554-65. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus285. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has benefits on left ventricle (LV) performance, but its mid-term effects on LV load and LV-arterial coupling are unknown.

AIMS

To evaluate CRT mid-term effects on LV-arterial coupling, arterial load and its determinants, and the association between CRT-dependent aortic haemodynamic changes and the arterial biomechanics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac and aortic echographies were done in 25 patients (age: 61 ± 12 years; 14 men; New York Heart Association functional classes III-IV; LV ejection fraction = 28 ± 7%, QRS = 139 ± 20 ms) before and after (23 ± 12 days) CRT. Standard structural and functional parameters and dyssynchrony indices were evaluated. Ascending aorta flow and diameter waveforms were measured. Central pressure was derived using a transfer function and the diameter calibration method. Calculus: arterial elastance (EA); aortic impedance (Zc) and distensibility (AD); systemic resistances (SVR), total compliance (CT); global reflection coefficient; LV end-systolic elastance (EES); and LV-arterial coupling (EA/EES). After CRT EA diminished (-30%;P = 0.001), EES increased (29%; P = 0.001) and EA/EES improved (pre-CRT: 2.9 ± 0.9, post-CRT: 1.6 ± 0.7; P = 0.001). Arterial elastance changes were associated with changes in arterial properties. Cardiac resynchronization therapy was associated with pressure-independent increase in mean aortic diameter (pre-CRT: 30.0 ± 4.0 mm, post-CRT: 33.0 ± 5.1 mm; P = 0.005) and distensibility (pre-CRT: 3.8 ± 2.6 × 10(-3)mmHg(-1), post-CRT: 6.4 ± 2.5 × 10(-3) mmHg(-1); P = 0.002), and Zc reduction (pre-CRT: 3.5 ± 1.8 × 10(-2)mmHg.s/mL, post-CRT:1.9 ± 0.8 × 10(-2) mmHg.s/mL; P = 0.001) and SVR (pre-CRT:1.7 ± 0.4 mmHg.s/mL, post-CRT:1.0 ± 0.3 mmHg.s/mL; P = 0.001). Changes in EA determinants were associated with changes in aortic flow.

CONCLUSION

Early after CRT central and peripheral arterial biomechanics improved, determining a pressure-independent increase in aortic diameter and a reduction in arterial load. Left ventricular systolic performance and LV-arterial coupling were enhanced. Arterial biomechanical changes were associated with aortic flow changes.

摘要

背景

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对左心室(LV)功能有获益,但对于 LV 负荷和 LV-动脉偶联的中期影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估 CRT 对 LV-动脉偶联、动脉负荷及其决定因素的中期影响,以及 CRT 依赖性主动脉血流动力学变化与动脉生物力学之间的关系。

方法和结果

在 25 名患者(年龄:61±12 岁;14 名男性;纽约心脏协会功能分级 III-IV;LV 射血分数=28±7%,QRS=139±20ms)接受 CRT 前后(23±12 天)进行了心脏和主动脉超声心动图检查。评估了标准结构和功能参数以及不同步指数。测量了升主动脉的血流和直径波形。使用传递函数和直径校准方法推导中心压力。计算:动脉弹性(EA);主动脉阻抗(Zc)和顺应性(AD);全身阻力(SVR)、总顺应性(CT);整体反射系数;LV 收缩末期弹性(EES);和 LV-动脉偶联(EA/EES)。CRT 后,EA 降低(-30%;P=0.001),EES 增加(29%;P=0.001),EA/EES 改善(CRT 前:2.9±0.9,CRT 后:1.6±0.7;P=0.001)。动脉弹性的变化与动脉特性的变化有关。心脏再同步治疗与平均主动脉直径(CRT 前:30.0±4.0mm,CRT 后:33.0±5.1mm;P=0.005)和顺应性(CRT 前:3.8±2.6×10(-3)mmHg(-1),CRT 后:6.4±2.5×10(-3)mmHg(-1);P=0.002)的压力独立增加以及 Zc 降低(CRT 前:3.5±1.8×10(-2)mmHg.s/mL,CRT 后:1.9±0.8×10(-2)mmHg.s/mL;P=0.001)和 SVR(CRT 前:1.7±0.4mmHg.s/mL,CRT 后:1.0±0.3mmHg.s/mL;P=0.001)有关。EA 决定因素的变化与主动脉血流的变化有关。

结论

心脏再同步治疗后早期,中心和外周动脉生物力学得到改善,导致主动脉直径的压力独立增加和动脉负荷降低。LV 收缩功能和 LV-动脉偶联得到增强。动脉生物力学的变化与主动脉血流的变化有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验