Shoff Carla, Yang Tse-Chuan
Social Science Research Institute and The Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, 601 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Tel: +1-814-659-0990.
Demogr Res. 2012 Sep 11;27(14):377-418. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.14.
Limited information is available about teenage pregnancy and childbearing in rural areas, even though approximately 20 percent of the nation's youth live in rural areas. Identifying whether there are differences in the teenage birth rate (TBR) across metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas is important, because these differences may reflect modifiable ecological-level influences such as education, employment, laws, healthcare infrastructure, and policies that could potentially reduce the TBR. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study are to investigate whether there are spatially varying relationships between the TBR and the independent variables, and if so, whether these associations differ between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties. METHODS: We explore the heterogeneity within metropolitan/nonmetropolitan county groups separately using geographically weighted regression (GWR), and investigate the difference between metropolitan/nonmetropolitan counties using spatial regime models with spatial errors. These analyses were applied to county-level data from the National Center for Health Statistics and the US Census Bureau. RESULTS: GWR results suggested that non-stationarity exists in the associations between TBR and determinants within metropolitan/nonmetropolitan groups. The spatial regime analysis indicated that the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on TBR significantly varied by the metropolitan status of counties. CONCLUSIONS: While the spatially varying relationships between the TBR and independent variables were found within each metropolitan status of counties, only the magnitude of the impact of the socioeconomic disadvantage index is significantly stronger among metropolitan counties than nonmetropolitan counties. Our findings suggested that place-specific policies for the disadvantaged groups in a county could be implemented to reduce TBR in the US.
尽管美国约20%的年轻人生活在农村地区,但关于农村地区青少年怀孕和生育的信息有限。确定大城市和非大城市地区的青少年出生率(TBR)是否存在差异很重要,因为这些差异可能反映了可改变的生态层面影响因素,如教育、就业、法律、医疗基础设施以及可能降低TBR的政策。目标:本研究的目的是调查TBR与自变量之间是否存在空间变化关系,如果存在,这些关联在大城市和非大城市县之间是否不同。方法:我们分别使用地理加权回归(GWR)探索大城市/非大城市县组内的异质性,并使用带空间误差的空间制度模型研究大城市/非大城市县之间的差异。这些分析应用于来自国家卫生统计中心和美国人口普查局的县级数据。结果:GWR结果表明,大城市/非大城市组内TBR与决定因素之间的关联存在非平稳性。空间制度分析表明,社会经济劣势对TBR的影响因县的大城市地位而异。结论:虽然在每个县的大城市地位内都发现了TBR与自变量之间的空间变化关系,但只有社会经济劣势指数的影响程度在大城市县中比非大城市县明显更强。我们的研究结果表明,可以针对县内弱势群体实施因地制宜的政策,以降低美国的TBR。