• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精性病因肝病患者的生物心理社会功能与自我感知疼痛水平的关系。

Biopsychosocial functioning in liver patients of alcoholic etiology as a function of self-perceived pain level.

作者信息

Pérez-San-Gregorio M A, Martín-Rodríguez A, Domínguez-Cabello E, Fernández-Jiménez E, Pérez-Bernal J

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2612-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.055.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.055
PMID:23146472
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biopsychosocial functioning among liver transplantation and cirrhotic patients as a function of self-perceived pain level.

METHODS

We selected two groups of liver patients of the same gender (men) and disease etiology (alcoholic): there were 39 liver transplant recipients and 34 severe cirrhotic patients. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the SF-36 Health Questionnaire were used. We applied analysis of covariance, with age and model end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores as covariates to assess the influence of two independent factors: (1) group (liver transplant recipients and cirrhotic patients), and (2) self-perception of pain (mild and high). We also calculated Cohen's d as an effect size index.

RESULTS

No interactive effects were found between factors group and self-perceived pain in any of the variables studied. With regard to the main effects, we found statistically significant differences in the following variables between: a) liver transplant recipients and cirrhotic patients: anxiety (P = .000), depression (P = .003), role-physical (P = .001), mental health (P = .016), general health (P = .000), vitality (P = .000), and physical functioning (P = .000); and b) liver patients with mild and high self-perceived pain: anxiety (P = .008), depression (P = .000), role-physical (P = .002), mental health (P = .000), vitality (P = .000), and physical functioning (P = .001). In all the indicated variables, with medium and large effect sizes (Cohen's ds from 0.58 to 1.64), the cirrhotic patients and patients with a high level of self-perceived pain had much poorer mental health and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Alcoholic cirrhotic male patients with a high level of self-perceived pain had the greatest biopsychosocial impairment, even exceeding the clinical threshold in the anxiety and depression scales; and the highest biopsychosocial well-being was associated with liver transplant recipients with a mild level of self-perceived pain.

摘要

目的

根据自我感知疼痛水平,比较肝移植患者和肝硬化患者的生物心理社会功能。

方法

我们选取了两组性别相同(男性)且疾病病因相同(酒精性)的肝病患者:39例肝移植受者和34例重度肝硬化患者。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表和SF-36健康调查问卷。我们应用协方差分析,将年龄和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分作为协变量,以评估两个独立因素的影响:(1)组别(肝移植受者和肝硬化患者),以及(2)疼痛自我感知(轻度和重度)。我们还计算了科恩d值作为效应大小指标。

结果

在所研究的任何变量中,均未发现组别和疼痛自我感知因素之间存在交互作用。关于主效应,我们发现在以下变量中存在统计学显著差异:a)肝移植受者和肝硬化患者之间:焦虑(P = 0.000)、抑郁(P = 0.003)、角色-身体功能(P = 0.001)、心理健康(P = 0.016)、总体健康(P = 0.000)、活力(P = 0.000)和身体功能(P = 0.000);b)自我感知疼痛轻度和重度的肝病患者之间:焦虑(P = 0.008)、抑郁(P = 0.000)、角色-身体功能(P = 0.002)、心理健康(P = 0.000)、活力(P = 0.000)和身体功能(P = 0.001)。在所有上述变量中,效应大小为中等和较大(科恩d值从0.58至1.64),肝硬化患者和自我感知疼痛程度高的患者心理健康和生活质量差得多。

结论

自我感知疼痛程度高的酒精性肝硬化男性患者生物心理社会损害最大,甚至超过焦虑和抑郁量表中的临床阈值;而生物心理社会幸福感最高的是自我感知疼痛程度轻的肝移植受者。

相似文献

1
Biopsychosocial functioning in liver patients of alcoholic etiology as a function of self-perceived pain level.酒精性病因肝病患者的生物心理社会功能与自我感知疼痛水平的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2612-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.055.
2
Affective status in liver transplant recipients as a function of self-perception of general health.肝移植受者的情感状态与对总体健康的自我认知的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2619-21. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.052.
3
Longitudinal study of liver transplant recipients' quality of life as a function of their perception of general health: at waiting list and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation.肝移植受者生活质量随其对总体健康感知的纵向研究:在等待名单时以及移植后3个月、6个月和12个月。
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3653-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.026.
4
Comparison of quality of life between two clinical conditions with immunosuppressive therapy: liver transplantation and multiple sclerosis.免疫抑制治疗的两种临床情况(肝移植和多发性硬化症)之间的生活质量比较。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2609-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.051.
5
Evolution of anxious-depressive symptomatology in liver and kidney transplant recipients: hospitalization and 12-month post-transplantation phases.肝肾移植受者焦虑抑郁症状的演变:住院期及移植后12个月阶段
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3656-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.029.
6
Coping strategies in liver patients as a function of relatives' anxiety level.肝病患者的应对策略与亲属焦虑水平的关系。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2616-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.106.
7
[Symptoms of anxiety and depression in liver-transplant patients].[肝移植患者的焦虑和抑郁症状]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(4):222-6.
8
Fatigue and physical function after orthotopic liver transplantation.原位肝移植后的疲劳与身体功能
Liver Transpl. 2002 Mar;8(3):251-9. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.31743.
9
Coping strategies and quality of life among liver transplantation candidates.肝移植候选者的应对策略和生活质量。
Psicothema. 2011 Feb;23(1):74-9.
10
Impact of health related quality of life in Catalonia liver transplant patients.加泰罗尼亚肝移植患者健康相关生活质量的影响
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jul-Aug;41(6):2187-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.139.

引用本文的文献

1
AASLD Practice Guidance: Palliative care and symptom-based management in decompensated cirrhosis.美国肝病研究学会实践指南:失代偿期肝硬化的姑息治疗与基于症状的管理
Hepatology. 2022 Sep;76(3):819-853. doi: 10.1002/hep.32378. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
A scoping review to identify and map the multidimensional domains of pain in adults with advanced liver disease.一项范围综述,旨在识别和描绘晚期肝病成人患者疼痛的多维度领域。
Can J Pain. 2020 Sep 15;4(1):210-224. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1785855.