University of California, Davis, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jan;42(1):155-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
Past research has typically focused on educational attainment and achievement to understand the assimilation process for immigrant youth. However, academic achievement constitutes only part of the schooling experience. In this paper, we move beyond traditional measures such as test scores and dropout, and examine patterns of school-sponsored extracurricular activity participation. Analyzing data from Add Health and drawing upon the frog-pond and segmented assimilation frameworks, we find that immigrant minority youth are disadvantaged in regards to activity participation relative to the average student in high- compared to low-SES schools. In high-SES schools, immigrant youth are less similar to their peers in terms of socioeconomic, race, and immigrant status, and as suggested by the frog-pond hypothesis, social comparison and ranking processes contribute to lower levels of social integration of immigrant youth into the school setting. We also find that as percent minority rises in high-SES schools, participation increases as well. The opposite pattern appears in low-SES schools: when percent minority increases, activity participation among immigrant minority students declines. These results are commensurate with both theoretical frameworks, and suggest that different mechanisms are at work in high- and low-SES schools. However, the effects of minority peers do not seem to hold for sports participation, and we also find that percent immigrant operates differently from percent minority, depressing the probability of activity participation across both high- and low-SES schools. The main implication of our results is that racially diverse, higher-SES schools are the most favorable contexts for the social integration of immigrant minority youth as well as third- and later-generation blacks and Hispanics.
过去的研究通常集中在教育程度和成就上,以了解移民青年的同化过程。然而,学业成绩只是学校教育经历的一部分。在本文中,我们超越了传统的衡量标准,如考试成绩和辍学率,考察了学校赞助的课外活动参与模式。我们分析了来自“增长机遇调查”的数据,并借鉴了青蛙池塘和分段同化框架,发现与低 SES 学校相比,移民少数族裔青年在活动参与方面相对于平均学生处于不利地位。在高 SES 学校,移民青年在社会经济、种族和移民身份方面与同龄人不太相似,正如青蛙池塘假说所表明的那样,社会比较和排名过程导致移民青年在学校环境中的社会融合程度较低。我们还发现,随着高 SES 学校中少数族裔比例的上升,参与度也随之上升。在低 SES 学校中则出现相反的模式:当少数族裔比例上升时,移民少数族裔学生的活动参与度下降。这些结果与两个理论框架相符,表明在高 SES 和低 SES 学校中,不同的机制在起作用。然而,少数族裔同伴的影响似乎不适用于体育参与,我们还发现,移民比例与少数族裔比例不同,它降低了高 SES 和低 SES 学校学生参与活动的概率。我们研究结果的主要含义是,种族多样化、社会经济地位较高的学校是移民少数族裔青年以及第三代及以后的黑人和西班牙裔融入社会的最有利环境。