Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Emergency Medical Services, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7594, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):155-61. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.722179. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
Outcomes of patients who fall from bridges lower than 160 feet above water have been poorly characterized. Pittsburgh offers a unique setting in which to study these patients as the city has 41 major bridges, only four of which are above 70 feet.
This study examined patients who fell or jumped from Pittsburgh bridges over a 10-year period for their characteristics, injury patterns, and the effects of prehospital care on outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who jumped or fell from bridges in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, over a 10-year period. Subjects were identified through manual searches of three data repositories: City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Pittsburgh River Rescue, and Allegheny County Medical Examiner records. Data abstracted included patient name, age, gender, date of birth, and address; incident date, time, location, and river conditions; prehospital interventions; emergency department intervention; hospital disposition; evidence of prior or subsequent psychiatric admission; toxicology results or evidence of substance involvement; and causes of death.
Seventy-four subjects were identified. Most were male (80%) young adults (mean age 34.3 years) who lived near the bridges from which they jumped or fell. Mortality from bridges less than 50 feet high was 18%; mortality from bridges 180 feet high was 75%. All patients who required prehospital interventions beyond warming or intravenous (IV) fluids died. Injury patterns were similar to those described for high-bridge patients, concentrated in the trunk or skull, but low-bridge injuries were milder and less common. Cause of death was predominantly drowning (84%). More than a third (47.3%) of the patients had previous psychiatric histories, but evidence of a previous attempt to jump was uncommon (5.4%).
People who jump from low- to medium-rise bridges may suffer injuries, but most often die from drowning. EMS interventions beyond water rescue are typically not helpful, emphasizing the importance of prevention and a water rescue plan.
从低于 160 英尺高的桥上坠落的患者的预后情况尚未得到充分描述。匹兹堡为研究这些患者提供了一个独特的环境,因为该市有 41 座主要桥梁,只有 4 座桥高于 70 英尺。
本研究调查了 10 年来在匹兹堡从桥上坠落或跳下的患者,分析了他们的特征、损伤模式以及院前急救对预后的影响。
我们对过去 10 年期间在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡从桥上跳下或坠落的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。通过对匹兹堡市紧急医疗服务局(EMS)、匹兹堡河救援和阿勒格尼县法医记录的三个数据存储库的手动搜索确定研究对象。提取的数据包括患者姓名、年龄、性别、出生日期和住址;事件日期、时间、地点和河流状况;院前干预措施;急诊科干预措施;医院处置情况;先前或随后精神病入院的证据;毒理学结果或物质使用的证据;以及死因。
共确定了 74 名患者。大多数患者为男性(80%)和年轻成年人(平均年龄 34.3 岁),居住在从桥上跳下或坠落的地方附近。从低于 50 英尺高的桥上坠落的死亡率为 18%;从 180 英尺高的桥上坠落的死亡率为 75%。所有需要除保暖或静脉输液以外的院前干预措施的患者均死亡。损伤模式与高桥上患者描述的相似,主要集中在躯干或颅骨,但低桥上的损伤较轻且较少见。主要死因是溺水(84%)。超过三分之一(47.3%)的患者有既往精神病史,但很少有证据表明之前有过跳桥企图(5.4%)。
从低到中高层建筑桥上跳下的人可能会受伤,但大多数情况下死于溺水。除了水上救援之外,EMS 的干预措施通常没有帮助,这强调了预防和水上救援计划的重要性。