Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, BeiHu Branch and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;94(5):951-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.030. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the effectiveness and safety of hyaluronic acid (HA) administration for ankle osteoarthritis (OA), and to investigate the effects of variations in HA regimens on treatment responses. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, including PubMed and Scopus, were searched from January 1995 to June 2012. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies that employed intra-articular HA to treat ankle OA. Four RCTs, 1 comparative study, and 4 single-arm prospective studies were identified, comprising 354 participants. DATA EXTRACTION: We determined effect sizes for selected studies by extracting pain scores from ankle OA or visual analog scales before and after HA or reference treatments. Meta-regression was implemented to determine whether outcomes were modified by variations in HA regimens. DATA SYNTHESIS: The pooled effect size of improvement scores from baseline was 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-2.75), whereas the values of comparisons with reference treatments including saline, exercise, and arthroscopy reduced to 0.85 (95% CI, -0.13 to 1.83). The placebo effect of the injection procedure accounted for 87% of the observed efficacy of HA treatment. The meta-regression indicated that the molecular weight was not associated with the magnitude of pain relief, but increases in total doses and active ingredients administered might result in a better outcome. Conversely, increases in injection volumes might cause a reduction of effect sizes. Regarding the side effects, the use of extremely high molecular weight HA frequently caused early postinjection pain. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular HA administration can significantly reduce pain in ankle OA compared with the condition before treatment, and it is likely superior to reference therapy. We recommend using multiple doses with an appropriate injection volume to achieve maximum effectiveness.
目的:探索透明质酸(HA)治疗踝关节骨关节炎(OA)的有效性和安全性,并研究 HA 方案的变化对治疗反应的影响。
资料来源:从 1995 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月,我们检索了电子数据库,包括 PubMed 和 Scopus。
研究选择:我们纳入了采用关节内 HA 治疗踝关节 OA 的随机对照试验(RCT)或前瞻性队列研究。确定了 4 项 RCT、1 项对照研究和 4 项单臂前瞻性研究,共纳入 354 名参与者。
资料提取:我们通过从 HA 或参考治疗前后的踝关节 OA 或视觉模拟量表中提取疼痛评分来确定选定研究的效应量。实施了荟萃回归分析,以确定 HA 方案的变化是否会改变结局。
资料综合:从基线改善评分的汇总效应大小为 2.01(95%置信区间[CI],1.27-2.75),而与包括盐水、运动和关节镜检查在内的参考治疗的比较值则降至 0.85(95%CI,-0.13 至 1.83)。注射过程的安慰剂效应占 HA 治疗观察疗效的 87%。荟萃回归分析表明,分子量与缓解疼痛的幅度无关,但增加总剂量和使用的有效成分可能会产生更好的结果。相反,增加注射量可能会降低效应大小。关于副作用,使用极高分子量的 HA 常导致注射后早期疼痛。
结论:与治疗前相比,关节内 HA 给药可显著减轻踝关节 OA 的疼痛,并且可能优于参考治疗。我们建议使用适当的注射量多次给药以达到最大疗效。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012-11-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017-12-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-2
J Clin Med. 2024-10-22
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023-5-19
Skeletal Radiol. 2023-5
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020-5-29