Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆增强术在距骨微骨折手术治疗骨软骨损伤中的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析

The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation in Microfracture Surgery Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Woo Inha, Park Jeong Jin, Seok Hyun-Gyu

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu 42415, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 29;12(15):4998. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154998.

Abstract

The appropriate surgical management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) remains a challenge for foot and ankle surgeons. Currently, microfracture (MF) is the first-line operative treatment for small osteochondral lesions. However, the fibrous cartilage regenerated after MF is mechanically inferior to hyaline cartilage regeneration and is susceptible to deterioration over time. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation compared with MF only or other adjuvant supplementations combined with the PRP + MF group (others) for the management of OLT. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent MF only and those who underwent PRP or other adjuvant materials such as hyaluronic acid or BST-CarGel. After the screening, four randomized controlled trials and one quasi-randomized controlled trial were included in this review. We used the following tools for clinical evaluation: the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain, and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to analyze the differences in outcomes between groups. Patients in the PRP + MF group had superior final VAS and AOFAS scores to the MF only group. (both < 0.01) However, no significant improvements between baseline and final follow-up were noted in either score. In addition, there was no remarkable difference in the overall FAAM pain measures between the two groups. The PRP + MF and others groups revealed no significant effect differences in the clinical scores. The results of this analysis suggest that PRP + MF would be more favorable and effective than MF only or additional adjuvant supplementation.

摘要

距骨骨软骨损伤(OLT)的恰当手术治疗对足踝外科医生来说仍是一项挑战。目前,微骨折术(MF)是小型骨软骨损伤的一线手术治疗方法。然而,MF术后再生的纤维软骨在力学性能上不如透明软骨,且易随时间恶化。因此,本荟萃分析旨在阐明与单纯MF或其他辅助补充治疗(与PRP + MF组[其他]联合使用)相比,富血小板血浆(PRP)增强治疗OLT的疗效。我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索了比较单纯接受MF治疗的患者与接受PRP或其他辅助材料(如透明质酸或BST - CarGel)治疗的患者临床结局的研究。筛选后,本综述纳入了四项随机对照试验和一项半随机对照试验。我们使用以下工具进行临床评估:美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分、踝 - 后足量表评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及足踝功能测量(FAAM)评分。采用标准化均数差(SMD)分析组间结局差异。PRP + MF组患者的最终VAS和AOFAS评分优于单纯MF组。(均P < 0.01)然而,两组评分在基线和最终随访之间均未观察到显著改善。此外,两组在总体FAAM疼痛测量方面无显著差异。PRP + MF组和其他组在临床评分上无显著效应差异。该分析结果表明,PRP + MF比单纯MF或额外的辅助补充治疗更有利且有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6762/10419373/7e1118d1e1e7/jcm-12-04998-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验