Suppr超能文献

兔屈趾深肌腱的随机幅度调制拉伸与循环加载相比降低了刚度,但不影响腱细胞代谢。

Stochastic amplitude-modulated stretching of rabbit flexor digitorum profundus tendons reduces stiffness compared to cyclic loading but does not affect tenocyte metabolism.

机构信息

Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 14;13:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-222.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been demonstrated that frequency modulation of loading influences cellular response and metabolism in 3D tissues such as cartilage, bone and intervertebral disc. However, the mechano-sensitivity of cells in linear tissues such as tendons or ligaments might be more sensitive to changes in strain amplitude than frequency. Here, we hypothesized that tenocytes in situ are mechano-responsive to random amplitude modulation of strain.

METHODS

We compared stochastic amplitude-modulated versus sinusoidal cyclic stretching. Rabbit tendon were kept in tissue-culture medium for twelve days and were loaded for 1h/day for six of the total twelve culture days. The tendons were randomly subjected to one of three different loading regimes: i) stochastic (2 - 7% random strain amplitudes), ii) cyclic_RMS (2-4.42% strain) and iii) cyclic_high (2 - 7% strain), all at 1 Hz and for 3,600 cycles, and one unloaded control.

RESULTS

At the end of the culture period, the stiffness of the "stochastic" group was significantly lower than that of the cyclic_RMS and cyclic_high groups (both, p < 0.0001). Gene expression of eleven anabolic, catabolic and inflammatory genes revealed no significant differences between the loading groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, despite an equivalent metabolic response, stochastically stretched tendons suffer most likely from increased mechanical microdamage, relative to cyclically loaded ones, which is relevant for tendon regeneration therapies in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

已经证明,加载的频率调制会影响软骨、骨骼和椎间盘等 3D 组织中的细胞反应和代谢。然而,线性组织(如肌腱或韧带)中的细胞的机械敏感性可能对应变幅度的变化比对频率更敏感。在这里,我们假设原位腱细胞对应变的随机幅度调制具有机械响应性。

方法

我们比较了随机幅度调制与正弦循环拉伸。将兔肌腱置于组织培养基中 12 天,并在总 12 天的培养期中每天加载 1 小时,持续 6 天。肌腱随机接受三种不同加载方式之一:i)随机(2-7%随机应变幅度)、ii)循环_RMS(2-4.42%应变)和 iii)循环高(2-7%应变),均在 1 Hz 下进行 3600 个循环,以及一个未加载的对照。

结果

在培养期末,“随机”组的刚度显著低于循环_RMS 和循环高组(均,p<0.0001)。十一个合成代谢、分解代谢和炎症基因的表达在加载组之间没有显著差异。

结论

我们得出结论,尽管代谢反应相当,但与周期性加载相比,随机拉伸的肌腱可能会受到更多的机械微损伤,这与临床实践中的肌腱再生治疗有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0a0/3557209/632eb5aa8158/1471-2474-13-222-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验