Suppr超能文献

医疗保险患者行主动脉瓣置换术后的临床和经济结局。

Clinical and economic outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement in Medicare patients.

机构信息

The Neocure Group LLC, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5:117-26. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S34587. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the standard of care for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who are suitable surgical candidates, benefiting both non-high-risk and high-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to report long-term medical resource use and costs for patients following AVR and validate our assumption that high-risk patients have worse outcomes and are more costly than non-high-risk patients in this population.

METHODS

Patients with aortic stenosis who underwent AVR were identified in the 2003 Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files and tracked over 5 years to measure clinical outcomes, medical resource use, and costs. An approximation to the logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) based on administrative data was used to assess surgical risk, with a computed logistic EuroSCORE > 20% considered high-risk.

RESULTS

We identified 1474 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent AVR, of whom 1222 (82.9%) were non-high-risk and 252 (17.1%) were high-risk. Among those who were non-high-risk, the mean age was 73.3 years, 464 (38.2%) were women, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 7%, whereas in those who were high-risk, the mean age was 77.6 years, 134 (52.8%) were women, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 37%. All-cause mortality was 33.2% for non-high-risk and 66.7% for high-risk patients at 5 years. Over this time period, non-high-risk patients experienced an average of 3.9 inpatient hospitalizations and total costs of $106,277 per patient versus 4.7 hospitalizations and total costs of $144,183 for high-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly patients undergoing AVR, long-term mortality and costs are substantially greater for high-risk than for non-high-risk individuals. These findings indicate that further research is needed to understand whether newer approaches to aortic valve replacement such as transcatheter AVR may be a lower cost, clinically valuable alternative.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)是严重、有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄且适合手术的患者的标准治疗方法,对非高危和高危患者均有益。本研究旨在报告 AVR 后患者的长期医疗资源使用和成本,并验证我们的假设,即高危患者的结局比非高危患者差,且成本更高。

方法

在 2003 年 Medicare 5%标准分析文件中确定了接受 AVR 的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,并对其进行了 5 年以上的跟踪,以测量临床结局、医疗资源使用和成本。使用基于行政数据的逻辑 EuroSCORE(欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统)近似值来评估手术风险,计算的逻辑 EuroSCORE>20%被认为是高危。

结果

我们确定了 1474 名接受 AVR 的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,其中 1222 名(82.9%)为非高危,252 名(17.1%)为高危。在非高危患者中,平均年龄为 73.3 岁,464 名(38.2%)为女性,平均逻辑 EuroSCORE 为 7%,而在高危患者中,平均年龄为 77.6 岁,134 名(52.8%)为女性,平均逻辑 EuroSCORE 为 37%。非高危患者的 5 年全因死亡率为 33.2%,高危患者为 66.7%。在此期间,非高危患者的平均住院次数为 3.9 次,每位患者的总费用为 106277 美元,而高危患者的住院次数为 4.7 次,总费用为 144183 美元。

结论

在接受 AVR 的老年患者中,高危患者的长期死亡率和成本明显高于非高危患者。这些发现表明,需要进一步研究以了解经导管 AVR 等主动脉瓣置换的新方法是否是一种成本更低、具有临床价值的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验