Hadley Heather S, Stanley Bryden J, Fritz Michele C, Hauptman Joe G, Steficek Barbara A
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Vet Surg. 2013 Feb;42(2):161-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01048.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
To compare effects of a cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) based gel (CMHA-S) to a standard wound management protocol on the healing of acute, full-thickness wounds in dogs.
A prospective, controlled, experimental study.
Purpose-bred, adult, female beagles (n = 10).
Two 2 × 2 cm wounds were surgically created bilaterally on the trunk of each dog and each side randomized to treatment (CMHA-S) or control (CON) groups. Total and open wound areas were measured with digital image planimetry at 15 time points. From these data, percent contraction and percent epithelialization were calculated. Tissue biopsies were obtained at 6 time points and histologic features were scored.
Total wound area was significantly larger and percent contraction was significantly less in CMHA-S compared to CON wounds at all data points between days 9 and 18. At day 25, and for the remainder of the study, CMHA-S wounds were smaller and contracted more than CON wounds, reaching significance at day 32. Percent epithelialization was significantly less in CMHA-S compared to CON wounds at all data points after day 11. Histologically, fibroblastic cellular infiltration was significantly higher in CMHA-S wounds at day 21.
CMHA-S wounds healed more slowly than CON wounds. This HA-based gel is not indicated in acute, full-thickness skin wounds in dogs as administered in this study. However, treatment may be beneficial in the mid-to-late repair stage of healing, or if scar minimization is desired. Further studies to evaluate the effects of the CMHA-S gel on canine wounds are indicated.
比较一种基于交联透明质酸(HA)的凝胶(CMHA-S)与标准伤口处理方案对犬急性全层伤口愈合的影响。
一项前瞻性、对照、实验性研究。
专门繁育的成年雌性比格犬(n = 10)。
在每只犬的躯干两侧通过手术制造两个2×2厘米的伤口,每侧随机分为治疗组(CMHA-S)或对照组(CON)。在15个时间点用数字图像平面测量法测量总伤口面积和开放伤口面积。根据这些数据计算收缩百分比和上皮化百分比。在6个时间点获取组织活检样本并对组织学特征进行评分。
在第9天至第18天之间的所有数据点,与CON伤口相比,CMHA-S伤口的总伤口面积显著更大,收缩百分比显著更小。在第25天及研究的其余时间,CMHA-S伤口比CON伤口更小且收缩更多,在第32天达到显著差异。在第11天之后的所有数据点,与CON伤口相比,CMHA-S伤口的上皮化百分比显著更小。组织学上,在第21天CMHA-S伤口中的成纤维细胞浸润显著更高。
CMHA-S伤口比CON伤口愈合更慢。在本研究中所施用的情况下,这种基于HA的凝胶不适用于犬的急性全层皮肤伤口。然而,在愈合的中后期修复阶段,或者如果希望将疤痕最小化,治疗可能有益。需要进一步研究来评估CMHA-S凝胶对犬伤口的影响。