• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk index for predicting perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death risk in asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.预测无症状颈动脉内膜切除术患者围手术期卒中、心肌梗死或死亡风险的风险指数。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):318-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.116. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
2
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Development of a validated model to predict 30-day stroke and 1-year survival after carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis using the Vascular Quality Initiative.利用血管质量倡议开发一个经过验证的模型,以预测无症状性狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术后30天内发生中风及1年生存率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):433-444.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.427. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
4
Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.2012 年颈动脉内膜切除术靶向美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库评估颈动脉内膜切除术后 30 天卒中和死亡的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
5
Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS): 4-year outcomes.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入系统进行颈动脉血运重建(CaRESS):4年随访结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):397-409. doi: 10.1583/08-2685.1.
6
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Risk Factors For Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, or Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy: Results From the International Carotid Stenting Study.颈动脉内膜剥脱术后发生中风、心肌梗死或死亡的危险因素:国际颈动脉支架置入研究结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;50(6):688-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
8
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
9
Preoperative symptom type influences the 30-day perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Registry.在血管外科学会血管登记处,术前症状类型会影响颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的30天围手术期结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):639-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.237.
10
The effect of combining coronary bypass with carotid endarterectomy in patients with unrevascularized severe coronary disease.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合颈动脉内膜切除术治疗未血运重建的严重冠状动脉疾病患者的效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):815-823. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.026. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.风险预测模型的外部验证可改善颈动脉内膜切除术患者的选择。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):87-99. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032527. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的管理可能需要个体化:多学科行动呼吁。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.04273. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Combined risk modelling approach to identify the optimal carotid revascularisation approach.联合风险建模方法以确定最佳颈动脉血运重建方法。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Sep;6(3):476-482. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000558. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Personalized-medicine on carotid endarterectomy and stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的个性化医疗
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1274. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1126.
5
A Multilevel Analysis of Surgical Category and Individual Patient-Level Risk Factors for Postoperative Stroke.手术类别及个体患者层面术后卒中风险因素的多水平分析
Neurohospitalist. 2020 Jan;10(1):22-28. doi: 10.1177/1941874419848590. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Predictive Score of Adverse Events After Carotid Endarterectomy: The NSQIP Registry Carotid Endarterectomy Scale.颈动脉内膜切除术不良事件的预测评分:NSQIP 登记处颈动脉内膜切除术量表。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013412. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013412. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Risk Prediction Tools to Improve Patient Selection for Carotid Endarterectomy Among Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.用于改善无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术患者选择的风险预测工具。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Apr 1;154(4):336-344. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5119.
8
Incidence and trends of cardiac complications in major abdominal surgery.主要腹部手术后心脏并发症的发生率和趋势。
Surgery. 2018 Sep;164(3):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Hypothermia during Carotid Endarterectomy: A Safety Study.颈动脉内膜切除术期间的体温过低:一项安全性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 8;11(4):e0152658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152658. eCollection 2016.
10
Perioperative and Long-term Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy for Japanese Asymptomatic Cervical Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Single Institution Study.日本无症状性颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期及长期预后:一项单中心研究
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(11):830-7. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0398. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery.评估手术风险调整模型时的 c 统计量的相关性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):822-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.041. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
2
Predictive factors for mortality after open repair of paravisceral abdominal aortic aneurysm.内脏旁腹主动脉瘤开放修复术后死亡率的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.078. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
3
Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery.手术心脏风险预测风险计算器的开发和验证。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):381-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015701. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
4
2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.2011年美国麻醉医师协会/美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/美国神经学会护士协会/美国神经外科医师协会/美国放射学会/美国神经放射学会/神经外科医师大会/动脉粥样硬化影像与预防学会/心血管造影和介入学会/介入放射学会/神经介入外科学会/血管医学学会和血管外科学会关于颅外颈动脉和椎动脉疾病患者管理的指南:执行摘要。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组、美国中风协会、美国神经科学护士协会、美国神经外科医师协会、美国放射学会、美国神经放射学会、神经外科医师大会、动脉粥样硬化影像与预防学会、心血管造影和介入学会、介入放射学会、神经介入外科学会、血管医学学会和血管外科学会的报告。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):489-532. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
5
A population-based study of risk factors for stroke after carotid endarterectomy using the ACS NSQIP database.基于人群的研究:使用 ACS NSQIP 数据库分析颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后中风的危险因素。
J Surg Res. 2011 May 15;167(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
6
Predicting risk of perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: derivation and validation of a clinical risk score.预测无症状颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期死亡和卒中风险:临床风险评分的推导和验证。
Stroke. 2010 Dec;41(12):2786-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599019. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
7
Inflammation in peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病中的炎症
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18):1862-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.918417.
8
The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.新英格兰心血管风险指数(VSG-CRI)血管外科患者的血管研究小组预测心脏并发症比修订后的心血管风险指数更准确。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):674-83, 683.e1-683.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.031. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality.出院后发病率和死亡率对医院手术质量比较的影响。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):183-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e4846e.
10
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.

预测无症状颈动脉内膜切除术患者围手术期卒中、心肌梗死或死亡风险的风险指数。

Risk index for predicting perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death risk in asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):318-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.116. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.116
PMID:23159474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3650300/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The latest guidelines recommend performance of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on asymptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, only if the combined perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or death risk is ≤3%. Our objective was to develop and validate a risk index to estimate the combined risk of perioperative stroke, MI, or death in asymptomatic patients undergoing elective CEA.

METHODS

Asymptomatic patients who underwent an elective CEA (n = 17,692) were identified from the 2005-2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a multicenter, prospective database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with primary outcome of interest being the composite of any stroke, MI, or death during the 30-day periprocedural period. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. A risk index was created by assigning weighted points to each predictor using the β-coefficients from the regression analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight percent of the patients were men with a median age of 72 years. Thirty-day incidences of stroke, MI, and death were 0.9% (n = 167), 0.6% (n = 108), and 0.4% (n = 72), respectively. The combined 30-day stroke, MI, or death incidence was 1.8% (n = 324). On multivariable analysis, six independent predictors were identified and a risk index created by assigning weighted points to each predictor using the β-coefficients from the regression analysis. The predictors included age in years (<60: 0 point; 60-69: -1 point; 70-79: -1 point; ≥80: 2 points), dyspnea (2 points), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3 points), previous peripheral revascularization or amputation (3 points), recent angina within 1 month (4 points), and dependent functional status (5 points). Patients were classified as low (<3%), intermediate (3%-6%), or high (>6%) risk for combined 30-day stroke, MI, or death, based on a total point score of <4, 4-7, and >7, respectively. There were 15,249 patients (86.2%) in the low-risk category, 2233 (12.6%) in the intermediate-risk category, and 210 (1.2%) in the high-risk category.

CONCLUSIONS

The validated risk index can help identify asymptomatic patients who are at greatest risk for 30-day stroke, MI, and death after CEA, thereby aiding patient selection.

摘要

目的

最新指南建议对有重度颈动脉狭窄的无症状患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),但需满足围手术期卒中、心肌梗死(MI)或死亡联合风险≤3%。我们的目的是开发和验证一种风险指数,以估计择期 CEA 无症状患者围手术期卒中、MI 或死亡的联合风险。

方法

从 2005-2010 年国家手术质量改进计划的多中心前瞻性数据库中确定了 17692 例接受择期 CEA 的无症状患者。主要观察结果为 30 天围手术期内任何卒中、MI 或死亡的复合结果。使用内部验证的 bootstrap 方法进行多变量逻辑回归分析。通过使用回归分析中的β系数为每个预测因子分配加权分数,创建风险指数。

结果

58%的患者为男性,中位年龄为 72 岁。30 天卒中、MI 和死亡的发生率分别为 0.9%(n=167)、0.6%(n=108)和 0.4%(n=72)。联合 30 天卒中、MI 或死亡发生率为 1.8%(n=324)。多变量分析确定了 6 个独立的预测因子,并通过使用回归分析中的β系数为每个预测因子分配加权分数,创建风险指数。预测因子包括年龄(<60 岁:0 分;60-69 岁:-1 分;70-79 岁:-1 分;≥80 岁:2 分)、呼吸困难(2 分)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(3 分)、既往外周血管重建或截肢(3 分)、1 个月内近期心绞痛(4 分)和依赖的功能状态(5 分)。根据总分<4、4-7 和>7,将患者分为低(<3%)、中(3%-6%)或高(>6%)风险的 30 天卒中、MI 或死亡联合风险。低风险组有 15249 例(86.2%),中风险组有 2233 例(12.6%),高风险组有 210 例(1.2%)。

结论

验证后的风险指数可以帮助识别 CEA 后 30 天卒中、MI 和死亡风险最高的无症状患者,从而辅助患者选择。