Suppr超能文献

舌下含服和口服卡托普利对高血压危象的同样作用。

Same effect of sublingual and oral captopril in hypertensive crisis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Nov;16(12):1642-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypertensive crisis is a condition characterized by rapid and inappropriate symptomatic elevation of blood pressure (BP) that is commonly seen in Emergency Departments. Oral or sublingual captopril is commonly used in the Emergency Departments. The unpleasant taste of the sublingual drugs causes uncomfortable condition to the patient. Studies showing no difference between oral and sublingual captopril has been ignored so far. Herein we compared the oral and sublingual captopril efficiency in the hypertensive urgencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, 71 patients admitted with hypertensive urgency to Emergency Departments of two hospitals in 2011 whose blood pressure were recorded before captopril administration and blood pressure were recorded after captopril administration at 0-5-15-30-45-60 minutes were included the study. The reductions of the blood pressure of oral and sublingual captopril groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients at oral and 43 at sublingual captopril group. The mean age ± SD was 58.13 ± 8.66 years and 41 (57.7%) patients were female. The most common complaints were headache, nausea/vomiting and weakness. 65 (91.5%) patients were using antihypertensive drugs before admitted to hospital. The blood pressure at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60th minutes of therapy didn't show any difference between oral and sublingual captopril use.

CONCLUSIONS

There was any difference between oral and sublingual captopril efficiency to control of hypertension in patient with hypertensive urgency. For a more comfortable treatment, oral captopril may be a more convenient choice in the hypertensive urgencies.

摘要

背景与目的

高血压危象是一种常见于急诊科的疾病,其特征是血压迅速且不适当地升高。在急诊科,通常使用口服或舌下卡托普利。舌下药物的不愉快味道会给患者带来不适。到目前为止,人们忽略了关于口服和舌下卡托普利之间没有差异的研究。在此,我们比较了口服和舌下卡托普利在高血压急症中的疗效。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性观察研究中,纳入了 2011 年因高血压急症入住两家医院急诊科的 71 例患者,他们在服用卡托普利前和服药后 0、5、15、30、45 和 60 分钟记录血压。比较了口服和舌下卡托普利组的血压降低情况。

结果

口服组有 28 例患者,舌下组有 43 例患者。平均年龄(SD)为 58.13±8.66 岁,41 例(57.7%)为女性。最常见的症状是头痛、恶心/呕吐和乏力。65 例(91.5%)患者在入院前正在使用降压药物。治疗后 0、5、15、30、45 和 60 分钟的血压在口服和舌下卡托普利组之间没有差异。

结论

在高血压急症患者中,口服和舌下卡托普利在控制血压方面没有差异。为了更舒适的治疗,在高血压急症中,口服卡托普利可能是更方便的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验