Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):181-92. doi: 10.1002/lary.23688. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To perform a systematic review and formal meta-analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in sinonasal papillomas. Since first reported in 1983, the etiological role for human papillomavirus (HPV) in sinonasal papillomas has been subject to increasing interest.
A systematic review, with meta-analysis and formal meta-regression.
Literature was searched through April 2012. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. Meta-regression was used to test the impact of study-level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin, papilloma type) on effect size, and potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry.
Seventy-six studies were eligible covering 1,956 sinonasal papillomas from different geographic regions. Altogether, 760 (38.8%) cases tested HPV-positive; effect size 0.421 (95% CI 0.359-0.485, random effects model). The summary HPV prevalence was highest (65.3%) in exophytic papillomas (EP), followed by inverted papillomas (37.8%) and cylindrical cell papillomas (22.5%). In meta-analysis stratified by 1) HPV detection technique, 2) geographic study origin, and 3) papilloma type, the between-study heterogeneity was significant only for the papilloma types (P = .001). In meta-regression, HPV detection method (P = .102), geographic origin (P = .149), or histological type (P = .240) were not significant study-level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies on EP. In sensitivity analysis, all meta-analytic results were robust to all one-by-one study removals.
Variability in HPV detection rates in sinonasal papillomas is explained by their histological types (not by HPV detection method or geographic origin of study), but none of the three were significant study-level covariates in formal meta-regression.
目的/假设:对报告人鼻鼻窦乳头瘤中 HPV 检测的文献进行系统回顾和正式的荟萃分析。自 1983 年首次报道以来,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)在鼻窦乳头瘤中的病因学作用一直受到越来越多的关注。
系统回顾,荟萃分析和正式的荟萃回归分析。
通过 2012 年 4 月的文献检索。使用事件发生率(95%置信区间[CI])计算效应大小,并使用 Cochran's Q 和 I(2)统计量进行同质性检验。荟萃回归用于检验研究水平协变量(HPV 检测方法,地理起源,乳头瘤类型)对效应大小的影响,并使用漏斗图对称性估计潜在的发表偏倚。
共有 76 项研究符合条件,涵盖了来自不同地理区域的 1956 例鼻窦乳头瘤。总共,760 例(38.8%)HPV 阳性;效应大小为 0.421(95%CI 0.359-0.485,随机效应模型)。外生性乳头瘤(EP)的 HPV 总流行率最高(65.3%),其次是内翻性乳头瘤(37.8%)和圆柱细胞乳头瘤(22.5%)。在按 1)HPV 检测技术,2)地理研究起源和 3)乳头瘤类型进行分层的荟萃分析中,仅在乳头瘤类型之间存在研究间异质性(P =.001)。在荟萃回归中,HPV 检测方法(P =.102),地理起源(P =.149)或组织学类型(P =.240)均不是重要的研究水平协变量。仅在 EP 研究中发现了一些发表偏倚的证据。在敏感性分析中,所有荟萃分析结果在逐一去除研究后均具有稳健性。
鼻窦乳头瘤中 HPV 检测率的变化由其组织学类型解释(而不是 HPV 检测方法或研究的地理起源),但在正式的荟萃回归中,这三个都不是重要的研究水平协变量。