Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Postal Zone: C-05-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 2013 Feb;34(8):586-96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs382. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
During epicardial electroanatomical mapping (EAM), it is difficult to differentiate between fibrosis and fat, as both exhibit attenuated bipolar voltage (BV). The purpose of this study was to assess whether unipolar voltage (UV), BV, and electrogram characteristics (EC) can distinguish fibrosis from viable myocardium and fat during epicardial EAM for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
Ten NICM patients (7 males, 56 ± 13 years) with VT underwent epicardial EAM with real-time integration of computed tomography-derived epicardial fat and contrast-enhanced MRI-derived scar. Bipolar voltage (filtered 30-400 Hz), UV (filtered 1-240 Hz), and EC (duration and morphology) were correlated with the presence of fat and scar. At sites devoid of fat, the optimal cutoff values to differentiate between scar and myocardium were 1.81 mV for BV and 7.95 mV for UV. Bipolar voltage, UV, and electrogram duration >50 ms distinguished scar from myocardium in areas covered with <2.8 mm fat (all P < 0.001), but not ≥ 2.8 mm fat. In contrast, electrogram morphology-characteristics could also detect scar covered with ≥ 2.8 mm fat (P = 0.001). A newly developed three-step algorithm combining electrogram morphology, duration, and UV could correctly identify scar with a sensitivity of 75%. Unipolar voltage but not BV could detect intramural scar in the absence of fat.
Both BV ≤ 1.81 mV and UV ≤ 7.95 mV are useful for detection of scar during epicardial EAM, in the absence of ≥ 2.8 mm fat. However, EC can be used to detect scar covered with fat. A newly developed algorithm combining UV and EC can differentiate between scar and viable myocardium. Unipolar voltage but not BV could detect intramural scar.
在心外膜电解剖标测(EAM)过程中,纤维化组织和脂肪组织的双极电压(BV)均会降低,因此两者较难区分。本研究旨在评估在非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者行室性心动过速(VT)消融的心外膜 EAM 过程中,单极电压(UV)、BV 和电图特征(EC)是否能在心外膜 EAM 过程中区分纤维化组织和存活心肌与脂肪。
10 名 NICM 患者(7 名男性,56±13 岁)行 VT 心外膜 EAM 检查,同时实时整合 CT 成像心外膜脂肪和对比增强 MRI 瘢痕。对比分析了双极电压(滤波 30-400 Hz)、单极电压(滤波 1-240 Hz)和电图特征(持续时间和形态)与脂肪和瘢痕的相关性。在没有脂肪的部位,BV 和 UV 区分瘢痕和心肌的最佳截断值分别为 1.81 mV 和 7.95 mV。BV、UV 和 >50 ms 的电图持续时间可以区分<2.8 mm 脂肪覆盖区域的瘢痕和心肌(均 P < 0.001),但无法区分≥ 2.8 mm 脂肪覆盖区域的瘢痕和心肌。相比之下,电图形态特征也可以检测到≥ 2.8 mm 脂肪覆盖的瘢痕(P = 0.001)。一种新的三步算法结合了电图形态、持续时间和 UV,可以以 75%的敏感性正确识别瘢痕。在没有脂肪的情况下,单极电压而非双极电压可以检测到心外膜下的瘢痕。
在心外膜 EAM 过程中,BV≤1.81 mV 和 UV≤7.95 mV 有助于在没有≥ 2.8 mm 脂肪的情况下检测瘢痕。然而,EC 可以用于检测有脂肪覆盖的瘢痕。一种新的结合 UV 和 EC 的算法可以区分瘢痕和存活心肌。单极电压而非双极电压可以检测心外膜下的瘢痕。