Clinic for Rhythmology at Klinikum Nürnberg Campus Süd, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae108.
Imaging using cardiac computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important option for anatomic and substrate delineation in complex atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. Computed tomography more common than MR has been used to detect procedure-associated complications such as oesophageal, cerebral, and vascular injury. This clinical consensus statement summarizes the current knowledge of CT and MR to facilitate electrophysiological procedures, the current value of real-time integration of imaging-derived anatomy, and substrate information during the procedure and the current role of CT and MR in diagnosing relevant procedure-related complications. Practical advice on potential advantages of one imaging modality over the other is discussed for patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices as well as for planning, intraprocedural integration, and post-interventional management in AF and VT ablation patients. Establishing a team of electrophysiologists and cardiac imaging specialists working on specific details of imaging for complex ablation procedures is key. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can safely be performed in most patients with implanted active cardiac devices. Standard procedures for pre- and post-scanning management of the device and potential CMR-associated device malfunctions need to be in place. In VT patients, imaging-specifically MR-may help to determine scar location and mural distribution in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy beyond evaluating the underlying structural heart disease. Future directions in imaging may include the ability to register multiple imaging modalities and novel high-resolution modalities, but also refinements of imaging-guided ablation strategies are expected.
心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振(MR)成像在复杂心房颤动(AF)和室性心动过速(VT)消融手术中,已成为解剖结构和病变部位描绘的重要选择。CT 比 MR 更为常见,用于检测手术相关并发症,如食管、大脑和血管损伤。本临床共识总结了 CT 和 MR 的现有知识,以促进电生理程序,实时整合成像衍生的解剖结构和病变部位信息在程序中的价值,以及 CT 和 MR 在诊断相关手术相关并发症中的作用。讨论了在植入式心脏节律装置的患者中,一种成像方式相对于另一种成像方式的潜在优势的实用建议,以及在 AF 和 VT 消融患者的规划、术中整合和术后管理中的建议。建立一个由电生理学家和心脏成像专家组成的团队,专注于复杂消融手术的特定成像细节是关键。心脏磁共振(CMR)可安全用于大多数植入式有源心脏装置的患者。需要制定设备扫描前和扫描后的管理标准程序,以及潜在的 CMR 相关设备故障。在 VT 患者中,成像特别是 MR 可能有助于确定缺血性和非缺血性心肌病患者的瘢痕位置和壁分布,除了评估潜在的结构性心脏病。成像的未来方向可能包括多模态成像的配准能力和新型高分辨率模式,但也有望改进成像引导的消融策略。