Kumar Pramod
Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Karnataka, Manipal, India.
Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 May;45(2):302-15. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.101304.
Role of negative pressure dressing and moist wound healing are well established in the treatment of both acute and chronic wounds with certain advantages and disadvantages in both the techniques. Both these techniques prevents wound colonization, but the negative pressure dressing method has proved to have a greater potency to remove secretions, prevent wound invasion and eradication established infection. In both these techniques there is no accessibility to wound environment. Limited access dressing (LAD) is a moist wound dressing with negative pressure. It provides limited access to the wound through two small ports for both dressers and pathogens. The LAD design has notable advantages like wound isolation that reduces chance of wound colonization and safe disposal of infected materials (important factor to reduce hospital-acquired infections), while avoiding some major disadvantages such as opacity of dressing materials, inaccessible offensive smelling wound environment, and relatively high treatment costs. In LAD a definite intermittent negative pressure regimen is followed. The intermittent negative pressure (cycle of 30 minutes suction and 3½ hours rest) is effective. Overall, the LAD is a safe and effective alternative to conventional dressing methods. LAD is an excellent research tool for wound healing as frequent/continuous record of wound healing is possible without disturbing the wound healing process. LAD is an effective dressing for limb salvage in cases of acute and chronic complex wounds. Leech effect prevents wound related systematic response syndrome and sepsis. Suction-assisted dressing (SAD) is a combination of semiocclusive dressing with negative pressure. It works by removal of fluids by intermittent (like LAD) negative pressure and preventing bacterial invasion. SAD is especially advantageous where soakage is less, there is no dead tissue covering the wound (e.g., following skin grafting), superficial skin wounds (e.g., donor area) and also where LAD is technically difficult to apply over circumferential trunk and neck dressings under anesthesia.
负压敷料和湿性伤口愈合在急慢性伤口治疗中的作用已得到充分证实,这两种技术都有一定的优缺点。这两种技术都能防止伤口定植,但负压敷料方法已被证明在清除分泌物、防止伤口感染和根除已形成的感染方面具有更强的效力。在这两种技术中,都无法接触到伤口环境。有限接触敷料(LAD)是一种带有负压的湿性伤口敷料。它通过两个小端口为敷料和病原体提供对伤口的有限接触。LAD设计具有显著优点,如伤口隔离可减少伤口定植的机会以及安全处理感染材料(这是减少医院获得性感染的重要因素),同时避免了一些主要缺点,如敷料材料不透明、无法接触到有异味的伤口环境以及相对较高的治疗成本。在LAD中,遵循确定的间歇性负压方案。间歇性负压(30分钟抽吸和3个半小时休息的周期)是有效的。总体而言,LAD是传统敷料方法的一种安全有效的替代方法。LAD是伤口愈合的一种优秀研究工具,因为可以在不干扰伤口愈合过程的情况下频繁/连续记录伤口愈合情况。LAD是治疗急慢性复杂伤口肢体挽救的有效敷料。水蛭效应可预防与伤口相关的全身反应综合征和败血症。负压吸引辅助敷料(SAD)是半封闭敷料与负压的结合。它通过间歇性(如LAD)负压去除液体并防止细菌入侵来发挥作用。SAD在渗出较少、伤口没有坏死组织覆盖(如植皮后)、浅表皮肤伤口(如供皮区)以及在麻醉下LAD技术上难以应用于躯干和颈部环形敷料的情况下特别有利。