Suppr超能文献

腭黏膜供区厚度评估及其与年龄和性别的关系。

Assessment of thickness of palatal mucosal donor site and its association with age and gender.

作者信息

Kuriakose Anu, Raju Saranyan

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Mar Baselious Dental College, Kothamangalam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul;16(3):370-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.100913.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of the study is to determine the thickness of the palatal mucosa by a direct clinical method, and the association of age and gender with the thickness of the palatal mucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty systemically and periodontally healthy Indian subjects participated in the study. The subjects were categorized according to age and gender. The thickness of the palatal mucosa was assessed by bone sounding. Acrylic stents provided 15 consistent locations for the measurement, defined according to the gingival margin and mid-palatal line.

RESULTS

The mean thickness of palatal mucosa was 2.48΁0.03 mm, ranging between 2.07 and 3.00 mm, among the participants. The younger age group had significantly thinner mucosa than the older age group. Females had thinner palatal mucosa than males, but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The palatal area from the distal line angle of the canine to the mesial line angle of the palatal root of the first molar provides sufficient donor tissue for grafting procedures. Factors such as body weight and genetic factors need to be further investigated. As the dimension of the soft tissue graft is an important factor influencing the success of the treatment procedure the assessment of the dimension is relevant to clinical periodontics.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过直接临床方法确定腭黏膜的厚度,以及年龄和性别与腭黏膜厚度的关联。

材料与方法

40名全身及牙周健康的印度受试者参与了本研究。受试者按年龄和性别分类。通过骨探测评估腭黏膜的厚度。丙烯酸支架根据牙龈边缘和腭中线提供了15个一致的测量位置。

结果

参与者中腭黏膜的平均厚度为2.48±0.03毫米,范围在2.07至3.00毫米之间。较年轻年龄组的黏膜明显比年长年龄组薄。女性的腭黏膜比男性薄,但无统计学意义。

结论

从尖牙远中连线角到第一磨牙腭根近中连线角的腭部区域为移植手术提供了足够的供体组织。体重和遗传因素等需要进一步研究。由于软组织移植的尺寸是影响治疗程序成功的重要因素,因此尺寸评估与临床牙周病学相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce01/3498706/df3cb1c7e7bc/JISP-16-370-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of thickness of palatal mucosal donor site and its association with age and gender.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul;16(3):370-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.100913.
2
Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age.
J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1407-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407.
3
Determination of thickness of palatal mucosa.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jan;16(1):80-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.94610.
4
Assessment of palatal masticatory mucosa: a cross-sectional study.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 May 1;14(3):536-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1358.
5
Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):462-469. doi: 10.1002/cre2.298. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Quantitative analysis of maxillary palatal masticatory mucosa thickness and anatomical morphology of palatal vault in Zhejiang province.
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Feb 25;51(1):87-94. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0334.
8
Evaluation of palatal mucosal thickness and its association with age and gender.
Biotech Histochem. 2014 Oct;89(7):481-7. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2014.893586. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography.
J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):406-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070302.

引用本文的文献

2
Enhancing keratinized mucosa around dental implant: Effective techniques and strategies - A review.
Bioinformation. 2024 Dec 31;20(12):1869-1872. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001869. eCollection 2024.
3
Three-dimensional mapping of the greater palatine artery location and physiology.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230066. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230066. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May;9(5):ZC66-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13759.5956. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Evaluation of variation in the palatal gingival biotypes using an ultrasound device.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC56-60. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12041.5724. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Comparative assesment of gingival thickness using transgingival probing and ultrasonographic method.
Indian J Dent Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;16(4):135-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.29908.
5
Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location.
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jul;32(7):828-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00757.x.
6
Periodontal ultrasonography.
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Oct;30(10):849-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00380.x.
8
Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age.
J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1407-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407.
9
Thickness of masticatory mucosa.
J Clin Periodontol. 2000 Jun;27(6):431-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027006431.x.
10
Retained free gingival graft rugae: a 9-year case report.
J Periodontol. 1999 Apr;70(4):438-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.4.438.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验