Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Nov;20(9):792-800. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12018. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
Staff and relative perspectives on patient aggression in dementia care units are seriously under researched in the U.K. Any work that has been conducted has relied upon quantitative studies. Qualitative research on aggression management in older peoples services are rare. In-depth views that can offer insights into causation and management strategies are therefore under represented in the literature. In order to investigate this issue further we interviewed a number of nursing staff and relatives in four U.K. care homes in the North West of England. Using a combined approach of one-to-one interviews (for staff) and focus groups (for relatives) we explored their views as to the reasons for and ways of responding to aggressive behaviour. This was part of a larger study reported upon elsewhere. Using thematic analysis we found similar results from both staff and relatives and as such their views were categorized into two broad areas: causation and management. In regards to causation we noted three sub-themes; internal, external and interpersonal factors which are further subdivided in the paper and for management two broad categories: the compassionate approach and 'don't go in strong'. The results indicated that staff in the participating units embraced a person-centred approach to aggression management. They predominantly respond to aggressive incidents with interpersonal strategies, such as distraction as opposed to medication or restraint. Overall they adopt a person centre approach to patient care. Relatives were clear in their perceptions of aggression as an interpersonal challenge, which is compounded or mediated by the illness of dementia. Consequently they were positive in their views of staff using non-coercive interventions. While the results of this and our earlier study are promising suggesting a less invasive approach to this aspect of dementia care, given the limitations of a small sample, more research of a similar nature is warranted. Findings from multidimensional studies can then provide a sounder basis for health and social care education, and person centred informed practice to reduce the incidence of aggression through preventative strategies.
在英国,针对痴呆症护理单元中患者攻击行为的工作人员和相关人员的观点严重缺乏研究。任何已进行的工作都依赖于定量研究。在老年人服务中进行的关于攻击性管理的定性研究很少。因此,深入的观点可以提供有关因果关系和管理策略的见解,在文献中代表性不足。为了进一步调查这个问题,我们采访了英格兰西北部的四家英国养老院的一些护理人员和家属。我们使用一对一访谈(针对工作人员)和焦点小组(针对家属)的组合方法,探讨了他们对攻击行为的原因和应对方式的看法。这是其他地方报告的更大研究的一部分。使用主题分析,我们从工作人员和家属那里获得了相似的结果,因此他们的观点分为两个广泛的领域:原因和管理。关于原因,我们注意到三个子主题:内部、外部和人际关系因素,在本文中进一步细分,而对于管理,则分为两个广泛的类别:富有同情心的方法和“不要强硬应对”。结果表明,参与单位的工作人员采用了以患者为中心的攻击性管理方法。他们主要通过人际关系策略来应对攻击事件,例如分散注意力,而不是药物治疗或约束。总体而言,他们对患者护理采取以患者为中心的方法。家属对攻击性行为的看法很明确,认为这是一种人际挑战,由痴呆症的疾病加重或调节。因此,他们对工作人员使用非强制性干预措施持积极态度。虽然这和我们之前的研究结果很有希望,表明在痴呆症护理的这一方面采取了侵入性较小的方法,但鉴于样本量较小,还需要进行更多类似性质的研究。多维研究的结果可以为健康和社会保健教育提供更可靠的基础,并为以患者为中心的知情实践提供依据,通过预防策略来减少攻击行为的发生。