Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.
J Clin Nurs. 2012 May;21(9-10):1453-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03924.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
To describe the frequency of aggressive acts experienced by frontline staff working in two models of dementia care: Residential Alzheimer's Care Centers and Secured Dementia Units and to explore the associations between aggressive acts experienced by frontline staff and factors related to the work context and care providers.
Aggression towards healthcare providers in residential long-term care settings is well documented. However, few studies have examined associations between aggressive behaviours towards care providers and organisational factors.
A cross-sectional survey.
The survey included demographic items and questions about aggressive acts experienced by staff and contextual factors. Analyses included: (1) descriptive statistics, (2) tests of difference (i.e. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, chi-squared test and anova), (3) bivariate associations (i.e. Pearson and Spearman rank order correlations) and (4) multivariate linear regression.
Ninety-one health care aides and licensed practical nurses working in four nursing units using two models of dementia care participated (response rate 81%). The most frequently reported types of aggression were physical assault (50% of staff, n = 45) and emotional abuse (48% of staff, n = 44). Aggressive acts were significantly associated with working in Secured Dementia Units rather than Residential Alzheimer's Care Centers.
Frontline staff working in Secured Dementia Units were exposed to higher frequencies of various types of aggressive acts mainly initiated by residents. Future research needs to explore modifiable workplace factors associated with aggressive acts in a larger sample across a variety of long-term care settings.
To prevent staff perceived aggressive acts, leaders and managers in dementia care need to acknowledge the complex topic of workplace aggression and encourage an open discussion among frontline staff without assigning blame. Care provider strategies for dealing with aggressive behaviour have to be implemented in policies and clinical practice.
描述在两种痴呆症护理模式下工作的一线工作人员所经历的攻击行为的频率:住宅阿尔茨海默氏症护理中心和安全痴呆症病房,并探讨一线工作人员所经历的攻击行为与与工作环境和护理人员相关的因素之间的关联。
在住宅长期护理环境中,针对医疗保健提供者的攻击行为有大量记录。然而,很少有研究检查针对护理提供者的攻击行为与组织因素之间的关联。
横断面调查。
该调查包括人口统计学项目以及有关工作人员经历的攻击行为和环境因素的问题。分析包括:(1)描述性统计,(2)差异检验(即学生 t 检验,曼-惠特尼 U 检验,卡方检验和方差分析),(3) 双变量关联(即皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼等级相关)和(4)多元线性回归。
有 91 名在使用两种痴呆症护理模式的四个护理单元工作的医护助理和持照的实用护士参加了研究(回应率为 81%)。报告频率最高的攻击类型是身体攻击(50%的工作人员,n = 45)和情绪虐待(48%的工作人员,n = 44)。攻击行为与在安全痴呆病房工作而不是在住宅阿尔茨海默氏症护理中心工作有显著关联。
在安全痴呆病房工作的一线工作人员主要受到居民的各种攻击行为的影响,其频率更高。未来的研究需要在更大的样本量和各种长期护理环境中,探索与攻击行为相关的可修改的工作场所因素。
为了防止工作人员感知到的攻击行为,痴呆症护理的领导者和管理人员需要承认工作场所攻击这一复杂问题,并鼓励一线工作人员在没有指责的情况下进行公开讨论。处理攻击行为的护理人员策略必须在政策和临床实践中实施。