Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;28(2):57-66. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32835b091f.
The aim of the present article is to test at a meta-analytical level the efficacy and safety of second-generation long-acting antipsychotic injections (SGLAI) in schizophrenia. Thirteen randomized-controlled trials comparing SGLAI with either placebo or oral antipsychotics were included in a quantitative meta-analysis (6313 patients). Efficacy and safety measures as well as demographic and clinical variables were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from authors. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's intercept. Heterogeneity was addressed with the Q statistic and the I² index. SGLAI were more effective than placebo injections [Hedges's g=0.336, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.246-0.426, Z=7.325, P<0.001] in reducing the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores, but no differences were observed compared with oral antipsychotics (Hedges's g=0.072, 95% CI -0.072 to 0.217, Z=0.983, P=0.326). There were more responders under SGLAI than placebo (47 vs. 24%, NNT 4, 95% CI 3-6), but no differences in comparison with oral antipsychotics [relative risk (RR)=0.962, P=0.094]. SGLAI and controls groups shared a common safety profile with respect to the number of deaths, overall number of treatment-adverse events, insomnia, QT prolongation, or pain in the injection site. There was a greater risk of developing extrapyramidal side effects with SGLAI than with placebo (RR=2.037, P<0.001) or with oral antipsychotics (RR=1.451, P=0.048). There was no evidence of publication bias (Egger's P=0.476), and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of results. The present meta-analysis shows superior efficacy for the SGLAI over placebo on psychotic symptoms, although with a relatively small effect size; no evidence of superiority in efficacy over oral antipsychotics; and modest evidence of greater symptoms of extrapyramidal side effects. These data suggest that SGLAI lack an advantage in reducing psychotic symptoms over oral medications. Their potential effects on relapse prevention should be better addressed by future randomized-controlled trials.
本文旨在通过荟萃分析测试第二代长效抗精神病注射剂(SGLAI)在精神分裂症中的疗效和安全性。纳入了 13 项比较 SGLAI 与安慰剂或口服抗精神病药的随机对照试验,进行了定量荟萃分析(6313 例患者)。从每篇出版物中提取疗效和安全性测量值以及人口统计学和临床变量,或者直接从作者处获得。使用漏斗图和 Egger 截距评估发表偏倚。使用 Q 统计量和 I²指数解决异质性。与安慰剂注射剂相比,SGLAI 更能有效降低阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分[Hedges's g=0.336,95%置信区间(CI)0.246-0.426,Z=7.325,P<0.001],但与口服抗精神病药相比无差异(Hedges's g=0.072,95%CI-0.072 至 0.217,Z=0.983,P=0.326)。SGLAI 组的应答者比例高于安慰剂组(47%比 24%,NNT 4,95%CI 3-6),但与口服抗精神病药相比无差异[相对风险(RR)=0.962,P=0.094]。SGLAI 和对照组在死亡率、总体治疗不良事件数、失眠、QT 延长或注射部位疼痛方面具有共同的安全性特征。与安慰剂(RR=2.037,P<0.001)或口服抗精神病药(RR=1.451,P=0.048)相比,SGLAI 发生锥体外系副作用的风险更高。没有发表偏倚的证据(Egger's P=0.476),敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。本荟萃分析表明,SGLAI 在精神症状方面优于安慰剂,尽管效果较小;在疗效方面没有优于口服抗精神病药的证据;并且有适度的证据表明锥体外系副作用的症状更大。这些数据表明,SGLAI 在减少精神症状方面与口服药物相比没有优势。未来的随机对照试验应更好地探讨其在预防复发方面的潜在作用。