Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5010, USA.
Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;119(4):888-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27616. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 97-14 revealed no difference between radiation delivered for painful bone metastases at a dose of 8 gray (Gy) in 1 fraction (single-fraction radiotherapy [SFRT]) and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (multifraction radiotherapy [MFRT]) in pain relief or narcotic use 3 months after randomization. SFRT for painful vertebral bone metastases (PVBM) has not been well accepted, possibly because of concerns about efficacy and toxicity. In the current study, the authors evaluated the subset of patients that was treated specifically for patients with PVBM.
PVBM included the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar spine regions. Among patients with PVBM, differences in retreatment rates and in pain relief, narcotic use, and toxicity 3 months after randomization were evaluated.
Of 909 eligible patients, 235 (26%) had PVBM. Patients with and without PVBM differed in terms of the percentage of men (55% vs 47%, respectively; P = .03) and the proportion of patients with multiple painful sites (57% vs 38%, respectively; P < .01). Among those with PVBM, more patients who received MFRT had multiple sites treated (65% vs 49% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .02). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in terms of pain relief (62% vs 70% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .59) or freedom from narcotic use (24% vs 27%, respectively; P = .76) at 3 months. Significant differences in acute grade 2 through 4 toxicity (20% vs 10% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .01) and acute grade 2 through 4 gastrointestinal toxicity (14% vs 6%, respectively; P = .01) were observed at 3 months, with lower toxicities seen in the patients treated with SFRT. Late toxicity was rare. No myelopathy was recorded. SFRT produced higher 3-year retreatment rates (5% vs 15%; P = .01).
Results for the subset of patients with PVBM in the RTOG 94-17 randomized controlled trial were comparable to those for the entire population. SFRT produced less acute toxicity and a higher rate of retreatment than MFRT. SFRT and MFRT resulted in comparable pain relief and narcotic use at 3 months.
放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)97-14 号试验显示,在随机分组后 3 个月,对于疼痛性骨转移的放射治疗,8 戈瑞(Gy)单次分割放疗(SFRT)与 30 Gy 10 次分割放疗(MFRT)在缓解疼痛或使用麻醉剂方面无差异。对于疼痛性椎体骨转移(PVBM)的 SFRT 并未得到广泛接受,这可能是因为对疗效和毒性的担忧。在目前的研究中,作者评估了专门针对 PVBM 患者的亚组患者。
PVBM 包括颈椎、胸椎和/或腰椎区域。在 PVBM 患者中,评估随机分组后 3 个月的再治疗率以及疼痛缓解、麻醉剂使用和毒性的差异。
在 909 名合格患者中,235 名(26%)患有 PVBM。有和没有 PVBM 的患者在男性百分比(分别为 55%和 47%;P =.03)和多个疼痛部位的患者比例(分别为 57%和 38%;P <.01)方面存在差异。在那些患有 PVBM 的患者中,接受 MFRT 的患者更多地接受了多个部位的治疗(分别为 65%和 49%;P =.02)。在缓解疼痛方面(分别为 MFRT 和 SFRT 的 62%和 70%;P =.59)或在 3 个月时无麻醉剂使用(分别为 24%和 27%;P =.76)方面,治疗无统计学显著差异。在急性 2 至 4 级毒性方面存在显著差异(分别为 MFRT 和 SFRT 的 20%和 10%;P =.01)和急性 2 至 4 级胃肠道毒性(分别为 14%和 6%;P =.01),SFRT 治疗的患者毒性较低。迟发性毒性罕见。未记录到脊髓病。SFRT 产生了更高的 3 年再治疗率(分别为 5%和 15%;P =.01)。
RTOG 94-17 随机对照试验中 PVBM 患者亚组的结果与整个人群的结果相当。SFRT 比 MFRT 产生的急性毒性更小,再治疗率更高。SFRT 和 MFRT 在 3 个月时的疼痛缓解和麻醉剂使用方面相当。