Suppr超能文献

在一家三级中心采用单次分割放射治疗单纯性骨转移瘤。

Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre.

作者信息

Peters Cedric, Vandewiele Julie, Lievens Yolande, van Eijkeren Marc, Fonteyne Valérie, Boterberg Tom, Deseyne Pieter, Veldeman Liv, De Neve Wilfried, Monten Chris, Braems Sabine, Duprez Fréderic, Vandecasteele Katrien, Ost Piet

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan 15;27:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant).

RESULTS

Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature.

摘要

背景

与多分割放疗(MFRT)相比,单次分割放疗(SFRT)在缓解单纯性疼痛性骨转移方面具有相同的止痛效果。尽管有此证据,但SFRT的采用率一直很低,已发表的单纯性骨转移的SFRT使用率从<10%到70%不等。我们旨在评估自2013年起在我们中心对国际指南进行更正式认可后,SFRT的采用情况及其随时间的演变。

材料与方法

我们对2013年1月至2017年12月期间在我们中心接受治疗的单纯性疼痛性骨转移的分割方案进行了回顾性研究。仅纳入接受1×8Gy(SFRT组)或10×3Gy(MFRT组)治疗的患者。我们排除了其他分割方案、原发性骨癌和术后放疗。单纯性定义为疼痛但不伴有即将发生的骨折、现有的骨折或现有的神经受压。研究了SFRT/MFRT使用情况的时间趋势和总生存率。我们进行了基于病灶的治疗模式分析和基于患者的生存分析。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验来评估分割方案之间的差异以及处方的时间趋势,使用Kaplan-Meier估计进行生存分析(p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义)。

结果

总体而言,352例患者和594处单纯性骨转移符合纳入标准。除年龄外,SFRT组和MFRT组的患者特征具有可比性。总体而言,所有转移灶中有92%采用了SFRT,而MFRT为8%。在整个研究期间,SFRT的使用率从2013年的85%上升至2017年的95%(p = 0.06)。与MFRT组(4%)相比,接受SFRT治疗的患者再照射率更高(14%)(p = 0.046)。SFRT组和MFRT组之间的四周死亡率和中位总生存期无显著差异(分别为17%对18%,p = 0.8;25周对38周,p = 0.97)。

结论

对于单纯性骨转移,遵循国际SFRT指南的情况良好,且随时间推移升至95%,这是文献报道的最高使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8f/7829104/d991a9c93bf4/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验