Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Ophthalmologica. 2013;229(2):80-5. doi: 10.1159/000342980. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
To assess the ability of the Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation software to identify the inner limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients.
Thirty-eight eyes of 38 naive exudative AMD patients were retrospectively included. They all had a complete ophthalmologic examination including Spectralis OCT at baseline, at month 1 and 2. Reliability of the segmentation software was assessed by 2 ophthalmologists. Reliability of the segmentation software was defined as good if both inner limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane were correctly drawn.
A total of 38 patients charts were reviewed (114 scans). The inner limiting membrane was correctly drawn by the segmentation software in 114/114 spectral domain OCT scans (100%). Conversely, Bruch's membrane was correctly drawn in 59/114 scans (51.8%). The software was less reliable in locating Bruch's membrane in case of pigment epithelium detachment (PED) than without PED (42.5 vs. 73.5%, respectively; p = 0.049), but its reliability was not associated with SRF or CME (p = 0.55 and p = 0.10, respectively).
Segmentation of the inner limiting membrane was constantly trustworthy but Bruch's membrane segmentation was poorly reliable using the automatic Spectralis segmentation software. Based on this software, evaluation of retinal thickness may be incorrect, particularly in case of PED. PED is effectively an important parameter which is not included when measuring retinal thickness.
评估 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 分割软件识别渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性 (AMD) 患者内界膜和 Bruch 膜的能力。
回顾性纳入 38 名未经治疗的渗出性 AMD 患者的 38 只眼。所有患者均接受完整的眼科检查,包括基线、第 1 个月和第 2 个月的 Spectralis OCT。两名眼科医生评估分割软件的可靠性。如果正确绘制内界膜和 Bruch 膜,则认为分割软件具有良好的可靠性。
共回顾了 38 名患者的图表(114 次扫描)。114/114 次光谱域 OCT 扫描中,分割软件正确绘制了内界膜(100%)。相反,59/114 次扫描中正确绘制了 Bruch 膜(51.8%)。在有色素上皮脱离 (PED) 的情况下,软件定位 Bruch 膜的可靠性低于无 PED 的情况(分别为 42.5%和 73.5%;p = 0.049),但与 SRF 或 CME 无关(p = 0.55 和 p = 0.10)。
使用自动 Spectralis 分割软件,内界膜的分割始终可靠,但 Bruch 膜的分割可靠性较差。基于该软件,视网膜厚度的评估可能不正确,特别是在 PED 的情况下。PED 实际上是一个重要的参数,在测量视网膜厚度时没有包括在内。