School of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL Northern Ireland, UK.
Animal. 2013 Apr;7(4):618-26. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002108. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of natural light and straw bales on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. Houses containing ∼23 000 broiler chickens were assigned to one of four treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Treatments involved two levels of access to natural light (NL) (present '+NL', or absent '-NL') and two levels of access to straw bales (SB) (present (30/house) '+SB', or absent '-SB'). All houses were windowed and artificially lit, and windows were shuttered where appropriate. Treatments were applied in one of the two houses on each of the two farms, and were replicated over four production cycles. Behaviour was observed in 2 to 6 weeks of the cycle. This involved observations of general behaviour and activity, gait scores (0 (perfect) to 5 (unable to walk)) and latency to lie (measured in seconds from encouraging a bird to stand). Production performance and environmental parameters were also measured. Average daytime light intensity and UV levels in the +NL treatment were 85.2 lx and 3.37 μW/cm2, respectively, and in the -NL treatment were 11.4 lx and 0 μW/cm2, respectively. Litter moisture levels were lower with NL treatment (P < 0.05), but were not affected by SB (P > 0.05). The percentage of time spent lying was significantly reduced by the provision of NL (P < 0.01), but not by SB (P > 0.05). There were three-way interactions between NL, SB and bird age on the percentage of time spent in locomotion (P < 0.05) and idling (P < 0.05). Both treatment factors had inconsistent effects on these parameters across different weeks. Levels of preening, resting and aggressive behaviour were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05). There was an interaction between treatments in average gait scores, with higher scores in the -NL-SB treatment than in all other treatments, and higher in the -NL+SB treatment than in the +NL treatments (P < 0.001). Average latency to lie was significantly higher with NL (P < 0.001) and SB (P < 0.05). We conclude that environmental modifications have the potential to increase activity levels and improve the leg health of commercial broilers. The light environment appears to be particularly important in this respect.
本研究旨在评估自然采光和麦草对商品肉鸡活动水平和腿部健康的影响。在一个 2×2 析因设计中,将包含约 23000 只肉鸡的鸡舍分配到四个处理组之一。处理组涉及两种自然光(NL)的获取水平(存在 '+NL' 或不存在 '-NL')和两种麦草(SB)的获取水平(存在(30/房) '+SB' 或不存在 '-SB')。所有的鸡舍都有窗户并进行人工采光,适当的地方会关闭窗户。在两个农场的两个鸡舍中的一个应用处理,在四个生产周期中进行重复。在周期的 2 到 6 周内观察行为。这包括观察一般行为和活动、步态评分(0(完美)至 5(无法行走))和卧倒潜伏期(从鼓励鸡站立开始测量秒数)。还测量了生产性能和环境参数。在 +NL 处理中,白天的平均光照强度和 UV 水平分别为 85.2 lx 和 3.37 μW/cm2,而在 -NL 处理中,白天的平均光照强度和 UV 水平分别为 11.4 lx 和 0 μW/cm2。NL 处理组的垫料水分含量较低(P<0.05),但不受 SB(P>0.05)影响。提供 NL 显著降低了躺着的时间百分比(P<0.01),但不受 SB(P>0.05)影响。NL、SB 和鸟类年龄之间存在三向相互作用,影响运动(P<0.05)和空闲(P<0.05)的时间百分比。在不同的周数,两个处理因素对这些参数的影响不一致。梳理、休息和攻击行为的水平不受处理(P>0.05)影响。处理之间存在平均步态评分的相互作用,-NL-SB 处理组的评分高于所有其他处理组,-NL+SB 处理组的评分高于 +NL 处理组(P<0.001)。平均卧倒潜伏期与 NL(P<0.001)和 SB(P<0.05)显著相关。我们得出结论,环境修饰有可能提高商品肉鸡的活动水平并改善腿部健康。光照环境在这方面似乎尤为重要。