Department of Psychology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 23;12:1023. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1023.
UK drinkers regularly consume alcohol in excess of guideline limits. One reason for this may be the high availability of low-cost alcoholic beverages. The introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol policy has been proposed as a means to reduce UK alcohol consumption. However, there is little in-depth research investigating public attitudes and beliefs regarding a minimum pricing policy. The aim of the present research was to investigate people's attitudes and beliefs toward the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol policy and their views on how the policy could be made acceptable to the general public.
Twenty-eight focus groups were conducted to gain in-depth data on attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol policy. Participants (total N = 218) were asked to give their opinions about the policy, its possible outcomes, and how its introduction might be made more acceptable. Transcribed focus-group discussions were analysed for emergent themes using inductive thematic content analysis.
Analysis indicated that participants' objections to a minimum price had three main themes: (1) scepticism of minimum pricing as an effective means to reduce harmful alcohol consumption; (2) a dislike of the policy for a number of reasons (e.g., it was perceived to 'punish' the moderate drinker); and (3) concern that the policy might create or exacerbate existing social problems. There was a general perception that the policy was aimed at 'problem' and underage drinkers. Participants expressed some qualified support for the policy but stated that it would only work as part of a wider campaign including other educational elements.
There was little evidence to suggest that people would support the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol policy. Scepticism about the effectiveness of the policy is likely to represent the most significant barrier to public support. Findings also suggest that clearer educational messages are needed to dispel misconceptions regarding the effectiveness of the policy and the introduction of the policy as part of a package of government initiatives to address excess alcohol consumption might be the best way to advance support for the policy.
英国饮酒者经常摄入超过指南限制的酒精。造成这种情况的一个原因可能是低价酒精饮料的高可得性。有人提议实行每单位酒精最低价格政策,以减少英国的酒精消费。然而,很少有深入研究调查公众对最低定价政策的态度和看法。本研究旨在调查人们对实行每单位酒精最低价格政策的态度和看法,以及他们对如何使该政策被公众接受的看法。
进行了 28 个焦点小组,以深入了解人们对实行每单位酒精最低价格政策的态度、知识和看法。参与者(共 218 人)被要求就该政策、其可能的结果以及如何使其更易被公众接受发表意见。使用归纳主题内容分析法对焦点小组讨论的转录内容进行分析,以确定主题。
分析表明,参与者对最低价格的反对意见有三个主要主题:(1)对最低定价作为减少有害酒精消费的有效手段持怀疑态度;(2)由于多种原因(例如,被认为是对适度饮酒者的“惩罚”)不喜欢该政策;(3)担心该政策可能会引发或加剧现有的社会问题。普遍认为该政策针对的是“问题”饮酒者和未成年饮酒者。参与者对该政策表示一定程度的支持,但表示该政策只有作为包括其他教育内容在内的更广泛运动的一部分才能发挥作用。
几乎没有证据表明人们会支持实行每单位酒精最低价格政策。对政策有效性的怀疑可能是公众支持的最大障碍。研究结果还表明,需要更清晰的教育信息来消除对政策有效性的误解,并且将政策作为政府解决过度饮酒问题的一系列举措的一部分推出,可能是争取政策支持的最佳方式。