Suppr超能文献

测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。

Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.

机构信息

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia.

Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.

Abstract

Acceptability of and public support for prevention are an important part of facilitating policy implementation. This review aims to identify, summarize and synthesize the methods and study designs used to measure and understand public opinion, community attitudes and acceptability of strategies to prevent chronic noncommunicable disease (NCDs) in order to allow for examination of imbalances in methodological approaches and gaps in content areas. We searched four scientific databases (CINAHL, Embase, Ovid/MEDLINE and Scopus) for peer-reviewed, English-language studies published between January 2011 and March 2020 in high-income, democratic countries across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Studies were included if they focused on opinions, attitudes and acceptability of primary prevention strategies and interventions addressing the key NCD risk factors of alcohol use, unhealthy diet, overweight/obesity, tobacco use and smoking, and physical inactivity. A total of 293 studies were included. Two thirds of studies (n = 194, 66%) used quantitative methods such as cross-sectional studies involving surveys of representative (n = 129, 44%) or convenience (n = 42, 14%) samples. A smaller number of studies used qualitative methods (n = 60, 20%) such as focus groups (n = 21, 7%) and interviews (n = 21, 7%). Thirty-nine studies (13%) used mixed methods such as content analysis of news media (n = 17, 6%). Tobacco control remains the dominant topic of public opinion literature about prevention (n = 124, 42%). Few studies looked solely at physical inactivity (n = 17, 6%). The results of this review suggest that public opinion and acceptability of prevention in the peer-reviewed literature is investigated primarily through cross-sectional surveys. Qualitative and mixed methods may provide more nuanced insights which can be used to facilitate policy implementation of more upstream strategies and policies to prevent NCDs.

摘要

可接受性和公众支持是促进政策实施的重要组成部分。本综述旨在确定、总结和综合用于衡量和理解公众意见、社区态度以及预防慢性非传染性疾病(NCD)策略可接受性的方法和研究设计,以便检查方法学方法的不平衡和内容领域的差距。我们在 CINAHL、Embase、Ovid/MEDLINE 和 Scopus 这四个科学数据库中搜索了 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在北美、欧洲和亚太地区高收入民主国家发表的同行评议的英文研究。如果研究重点是关于酒精使用、不健康饮食、超重/肥胖、烟草使用和吸烟以及身体活动不足等主要 NCD 风险因素的一级预防策略和干预措施的意见、态度和可接受性,则将其纳入研究。共纳入 293 项研究。三分之二的研究(n=194,66%)使用定量方法,如横断面研究,涉及代表性调查(n=129,44%)或便利样本(n=42,14%)。少数研究使用定性方法(n=60,20%),如焦点小组(n=21,7%)和访谈(n=21,7%)。39 项研究(13%)使用混合方法,如新闻媒体内容分析(n=17,6%)。烟草控制仍然是预防公共舆论文献中的主导主题(n=124,42%)。很少有研究仅关注身体活动不足(n=17,6%)。本综述的结果表明,主要通过横断面调查研究来调查同行评议文献中预防的公众意见和可接受性。定性和混合方法可以提供更细致的见解,可用于促进预防 NCD 的更上游策略和政策的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b11a/8895540/fe76a2fcb4ad/12961_2022_829_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验