Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Obes Rev. 2013 Feb;14(2):110-28. doi: 10.1111/obr.12002. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
Taxes and subsidies are increasingly being considered as potential policy instruments to incentivize consumers to improve their food and beverage consumption patterns and related health outcomes. This study provided a systematic review of recent U.S. studies on the price elasticity of demand for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), fast food, and fruits and vegetables, as well as the direct associations of prices/taxes with body weight outcomes. Based on the recent literature, the price elasticity of demand for SSBs, fast food, fruits and vegetables was estimated to be -1.21, -0.52, -0.49 and -0.48, respectively. The studies that linked soda taxes to weight outcomes showed minimal impacts on weight; however, they were based on existing state-level sales taxes that were relatively low. Higher fast-food prices were associated with lower weight outcomes particularly among adolescents, suggesting that raising prices would potentially impact weight outcomes. Lower fruit and vegetable prices were generally found to be associated with lower body weight outcomes among both low-income children and adults, suggesting that subsidies that would reduce the cost of fruits and vegetables for lower-socioeconomic populations may be effective in reducing obesity. Pricing instruments should continue to be considered and evaluated as potential policy instruments to address public health risks.
税收和补贴正越来越多地被视为潜在的政策工具,以激励消费者改善其食品和饮料消费模式及相关健康结果。本研究对美国近期关于含糖饮料(SSB)、快餐和水果与蔬菜需求价格弹性的研究以及价格/税收与体重结果的直接关联进行了系统回顾。根据最近的文献,SSB、快餐、水果和蔬菜的需求价格弹性估计分别为-1.21、-0.52、-0.49 和-0.48。将苏打税与体重结果联系起来的研究表明,对体重的影响很小;然而,这些研究是基于现有的州级销售税,其税率相对较低。较高的快餐价格与较低的体重结果有关,尤其是在青少年中,这表明提高价格可能会对体重结果产生影响。一般来说,较低的水果和蔬菜价格与低收入儿童和成年人较低的体重结果有关,这表明降低水果和蔬菜价格的补贴可能会有效减少贫困人口的肥胖率。定价工具应继续被视为潜在的政策工具,以应对公共健康风险。