• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析血清α-胎蛋白-L3%和去γ羧基凝血酶原标志物在甲胎蛋白总水平误导性肝细胞癌病例中的应用。

Analysis of serum α-fetoprotein-L3% and des-γ carboxyprothrombin markers in cases with misleading hepatocellular carcinoma total α-fetoprotein levels.

机构信息

Academic Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece.

出版信息

Oncol Rep. 2013 Feb;29(2):835-9. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2147. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

DOI:10.3892/or.2012.2147
PMID:23174906
Abstract

Serum fraction of α-fetoprotein L3 (AFP-L3%) and des-γ carboxyprothrombin (DCP) are proposed serum markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated their performance in two patient populations with total AFP levels non-diagnostic for HCC. From a cohort of 150 consecutive patients with HCC, 60 patients with total AFP <200 ng/ml were identified. Additionally, 50 patients with elevated AFP and no radiological evidence of HCC, for at least one year of follow-up, were included. AFP-L3% and DCP were measured by the Liquid Phase Binding Assay System (LiBASys). In cases where AFP-L3% was undetectable, a more sensitive method based on-chip electrokinetic reaction was applied. AFP-L3% was found to be positive in 22 (36.7%) of patients with HCC and 6 (12%) of non-HCC patients. DCP was found to be positive in 26 patients with HCC (43%) and in none of the non-HCC patients. Thirty-six out of sixty (60%) patients with HCC were positive for either AFP-L3% or DCP. With the on-chip technology, AFP-L3% was found to be positive in 10 patients with HCC and in 5 patients without HCC, who tested negative by LiBASys. The final sensitivity of combined AFP, AFP-L3% and DCP testing, in the entire cohort of patients with HCC, was 84%. The specificity of AFP-L3% and DCP in the studied population was 78.5 and 100%, respectively. The addition of AFP-L3% and DCP increased the sensitivity and specificity of total serum AFP for the diagnosis of HCC. The on chip AFP-L3% assay was more sensitive but less specific compared to LiBASys.

摘要

血清甲胎蛋白 L3 分数 (AFP-L3%) 和去γ羧基凝血酶原 (DCP) 被提议作为肝细胞癌 (HCC) 的诊断血清标志物。我们在两个总 AFP 水平对 HCC 无诊断意义的患者人群中评估了它们的性能。从 150 例连续 HCC 患者队列中,确定了 60 例总 AFP<200ng/ml 的患者。此外,还纳入了 50 例 AFP 升高但至少一年随访无 HCC 影像学证据的患者。AFP-L3%和 DCP 通过液相结合测定系统 (LiBASys) 进行测量。在 AFP-L3%不可检测的情况下,应用基于芯片的电泳反应的更敏感方法。在 HCC 患者中,22 例 (36.7%) AFP-L3%阳性,12 例 (12%) 非 HCC 患者 AFP-L3%阳性。在 26 例 HCC 患者中发现 DCP 阳性 (43%),在非 HCC 患者中均未发现 DCP 阳性。60 例 HCC 患者中有 36 例 AFP-L3%或 DCP 阳性。使用芯片技术,在 10 例 HCC 患者和 5 例 LiBASys 检测阴性的非 HCC 患者中发现 AFP-L3%阳性。在整个 HCC 患者队列中,联合 AFP、AFP-L3%和 DCP 检测的最终敏感性为 84%。在研究人群中,AFP-L3%和 DCP 的特异性分别为 78.5%和 100%。AFP-L3%和 DCP 的添加提高了总血清 AFP 诊断 HCC 的敏感性和特异性。与 LiBASys 相比,芯片 AFP-L3% 检测更敏感但特异性较低。

相似文献

1
Analysis of serum α-fetoprotein-L3% and des-γ carboxyprothrombin markers in cases with misleading hepatocellular carcinoma total α-fetoprotein levels.分析血清α-胎蛋白-L3%和去γ羧基凝血酶原标志物在甲胎蛋白总水平误导性肝细胞癌病例中的应用。
Oncol Rep. 2013 Feb;29(2):835-9. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.2147. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
2
Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, alpha-fetoprotein and AFP-L3 in patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.慢性肝炎、肝硬化和肝细胞癌患者的去γ-羧基凝血酶原、甲胎蛋白和甲胎蛋白-L3
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Oct;23(10):1541-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05395.x. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
3
Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma.早期肝细胞癌中的甲胎蛋白、去γ羧基凝血酶原和凝集素结合甲胎蛋白
Gastroenterology. 2009 Jul;137(1):110-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
4
Novel Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein: a biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with low α-fetoprotein concentrations.新型刀豆球蛋白 A 反应性α-甲胎蛋白片段:低甲胎蛋白浓度肝癌患者肝癌复发的生物标志物。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug;17(4):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0306-3. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
5
Sequential fluctuation pattern of serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin levels detected by high-sensitive electrochemiluminescence system as an early predictive marker for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.采用高敏电化学发光系统检测血清去γ-羧基凝血酶原水平的序贯波动模式,作为肝硬化患者肝细胞癌的早期预测标志物。
Int J Mol Med. 2002 Mar;9(3):245-50.
6
Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma may impair the performance of biomarkers: a comparison of AFP, DCP, and AFP-L3.肝细胞癌的危险因素可能会影响生物标志物的性能:甲胎蛋白、异常凝血酶原和甲胎蛋白异质体-L3的比较。
Cancer Biomark. 2007;3(2):79-87. doi: 10.3233/cbm-2007-3202.
7
Clinicopathologic features of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seropositive for alpha-fetoprotein-L3 and seronegative for des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in comparison with those seropositive for des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin alone.甲胎蛋白-L3呈血清阳性且去γ-羧基凝血酶原呈血清阴性的肝细胞癌患者与仅去γ-羧基凝血酶原呈血清阳性的患者的临床病理特征比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Jul;17(7):772-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02806.x.
8
Clinical utility of simultaneous measurement of serum high-sensitivity des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin and Lens culinaris agglutinin A-reactive alpha-fetoprotein in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.同时检测血清高灵敏度去γ-羧基凝血酶原和刀豆球蛋白A反应性甲胎蛋白在小肝细胞癌患者中的临床应用价值
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Dec;11(12):1387-92. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199912000-00008.
9
Utility of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, alone or in combination, as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.单独或联合使用甲胎蛋白的豆凝集素反应性组分和去γ-羧基凝血酶原作为肝细胞癌生物标志物的效用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jan;7(1):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.041. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
10
Clinical Significance of Preoperative Hepatocellular Carcinoma With High Agglutinin-reactive Fraction of Alpha-Fetoprotein, But Low Alpha-Fetoprotein.术前甲胎蛋白凝集素反应性分数高但甲胎蛋白水平低的肝细胞癌的临床意义
Anticancer Res. 2019 Feb;39(2):883-889. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13189.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma biomarker alpha-fetoprotein.肝细胞癌生物标志物甲胎蛋白的定量质谱分析
RSC Chem Biol. 2023 Oct 9;4(12):1073-1081. doi: 10.1039/d3cb00069a. eCollection 2023 Nov 29.
2
Enhancement of treatment efficacy of hepatic tumours using Trans-arterial-chemoembolization.经动脉化疗栓塞术提高肝肿瘤治疗效果
Am J Cancer Res. 2023 May 15;13(5):1623-1639. eCollection 2023.
3
Circular RNA 0006602 in plasma exosomes: a new potential diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma.
血浆外泌体中的环状RNA 0006602:一种用于肝细胞癌的新型潜在诊断生物标志物。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6001-6015. eCollection 2021.
4
cccDNA Maintenance in Chronic Hepatitis B - Targeting the Matrix of Viral Replication.慢性乙型肝炎中的cccDNA维持——靶向病毒复制的基质
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Oct 29;13:3873-3886. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S240472. eCollection 2020.
5
The diagnostic value of PIVKA-II, AFP, AFP-L3, CEA, and their combinations in primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.异常凝血酶原、甲胎蛋白、甲胎蛋白异质体 3、癌胚抗原及其联合检测对原发性和转移性肝细胞癌的诊断价值。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 May;34(5):e23158. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23158. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Serum levels of anti-sperm-associated antigen 9 antibody are elevated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者血清中抗精子相关抗原9抗体水平升高。
Oncol Lett. 2017 Dec;14(6):7608-7614. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7152. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
Usefulness of AFP, AFP-L3, and PIVKA-II, and their combinations in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.甲胎蛋白(AFP)、甲胎蛋白异质体-L3(AFP-L3)和异常凝血酶原(PIVKA-II)及其联合检测在肝细胞癌诊断中的应用价值
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(11):e5811. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005811.
8
Controversies regarding and perspectives on clinical utility of biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌生物标志物临床应用的争议与展望
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 7;22(1):262-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.262.
9
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Concepts in Diagnosis, Staging and Treatment.肝细胞癌:诊断、分期与治疗的当前概念
Gastrointest Tumors. 2014 Jun;1(2):84-92. doi: 10.1159/000362583. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Diagnostic and therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的诊断与治疗管理
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 14;21(42):12003-21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12003.