Wehling Paul, Devries Jonathan W
General Mills, Inc., 330 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2012 Sep-Oct;95(5):1541-6. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-078.
The quest for optimum methodology for any analyte often includes a study of the method in multiple independent laboratories. Evaluation of the results of these studies is typically subjective; however, various attempts have been made to increase the objectivity of the evaluation. Among the objective propositions is the use of the Horwitz Ratio (HorRat) as applied to collaborative study statistics. A historical review of fiber method validation studies performed since 1940 shows that the Horwitz curve does not effectively predict the results of dietary fiber collaborative studies, either retrospectively or prospectively. Consequently, use of the HorRat as a criterion for accepting or rejecting dietary fiber methods is contraindicated. An alternative, objective statistical approach is proposed that may also apply to collaborative studies of other empirical analytical methods in general.
对于任何分析物而言,寻求最佳方法通常包括在多个独立实验室对该方法进行研究。对这些研究结果的评估通常是主观的;然而,人们已进行了各种尝试以提高评估的客观性。客观的建议之一是将霍维茨比率(HorRat)应用于协作研究统计。对自1940年以来进行的纤维方法验证研究的历史回顾表明,无论从回顾性还是前瞻性角度来看,霍维茨曲线都无法有效预测膳食纤维协作研究的结果。因此,不建议使用霍维茨比率作为接受或拒绝膳食纤维方法的标准。本文提出了一种替代性的客观统计方法,该方法通常也可能适用于其他经验分析方法的协作研究。