Suppr超能文献

关于使用霍维茨比率(HorRat)作为膳食纤维协作研究的验收标准。

On the use of the Horwitz Ratio (HorRat) as an acceptance criterion for dietary fiber collaborative studies.

作者信息

Wehling Paul, Devries Jonathan W

机构信息

General Mills, Inc., 330 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2012 Sep-Oct;95(5):1541-6. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-078.

Abstract

The quest for optimum methodology for any analyte often includes a study of the method in multiple independent laboratories. Evaluation of the results of these studies is typically subjective; however, various attempts have been made to increase the objectivity of the evaluation. Among the objective propositions is the use of the Horwitz Ratio (HorRat) as applied to collaborative study statistics. A historical review of fiber method validation studies performed since 1940 shows that the Horwitz curve does not effectively predict the results of dietary fiber collaborative studies, either retrospectively or prospectively. Consequently, use of the HorRat as a criterion for accepting or rejecting dietary fiber methods is contraindicated. An alternative, objective statistical approach is proposed that may also apply to collaborative studies of other empirical analytical methods in general.

摘要

对于任何分析物而言,寻求最佳方法通常包括在多个独立实验室对该方法进行研究。对这些研究结果的评估通常是主观的;然而,人们已进行了各种尝试以提高评估的客观性。客观的建议之一是将霍维茨比率(HorRat)应用于协作研究统计。对自1940年以来进行的纤维方法验证研究的历史回顾表明,无论从回顾性还是前瞻性角度来看,霍维茨曲线都无法有效预测膳食纤维协作研究的结果。因此,不建议使用霍维茨比率作为接受或拒绝膳食纤维方法的标准。本文提出了一种替代性的客观统计方法,该方法通常也可能适用于其他经验分析方法的协作研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验