DeVries Jonathan W
Medallion Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Feb;62(1):37-43. doi: 10.1079/PNS2002234.
Establishing a definition for dietary fibre has historically been a balance between nutrition knowledge and analytical method capabilities. While the most widely accepted physiologically-based definitions have generally been accurate in defining the dietary fibre in foods, scientists and regulators have tended, in practice, to rely on analytical procedures as the definitional basis in fact. As a result, incongruities between theory and practice have resulted in confusion regarding the components that make up dietary fibre. In November 1998 the president of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) appointed an expert scientific review committee and charged it with the task of reviewing and, if necessary, updating the definition of dietary fibre. The committee was further charged with assessing the state of analytical methodology and making recommendations relevant to the updated definition. After due deliberation, an updated definition of dietary fibre was delivered to the AACC Board of Directors for consideration and adoption (Anon, 2000; Jones 2000b). The updated definition includes the same food components as the historical working definition used for approximately 30 years (a very important point, considering that the majority of the research of the past 30 years delineating the positive health effects of dietary fibre is based on that working definition). However, the updated definition more clearly delineates the make-up of dietary fibre and its physiological functionality. As a result, relatively few changes will be necessary in analytical methodology. Current methodologies, in particular AACC-approved method of analysis 32-05 (Grami, 2000), Association of Official Analytical Chemists' official method of analysis 985.29 (Horwitz, 2000a) or AACC 32-07 (Grami, 2000) Association of Official Analytical Chemists 991.43 (Horwitz, 2000a) will continue to be sufficient and used for most foods. A small number of additional methods will be necessary to quantify the dietary fibre levels in foods containing fibres such as fructans (polymers and oligomers of fructose, inulin), modified dextrins, and/or synthetic dietary fibre analogues.
从历史角度来看,膳食纤维定义的确立一直是营养知识与分析方法能力之间的平衡。虽然最广泛接受的基于生理学的定义在界定食物中的膳食纤维时总体上是准确的,但实际上科学家和监管机构往往依赖分析程序作为定义的基础。因此,理论与实践之间的不一致导致了对构成膳食纤维的成分的困惑。1998年11月,美国谷物化学家协会(AACC)主席任命了一个专家科学审查委员会,负责审查并在必要时更新膳食纤维的定义。该委员会还负责评估分析方法的现状,并就更新后的定义提出相关建议。经过充分审议,一份更新后的膳食纤维定义提交给AACC董事会以供审议和采纳(匿名,2000年;琼斯,2000年b)。更新后的定义包含了与过去约30年使用的历史工作定义相同的食物成分(考虑到过去30年中描述膳食纤维对健康有益影响的大多数研究都是基于该工作定义,这是一个非常重要的点)。然而,更新后的定义更清晰地描述了膳食纤维的组成及其生理功能。因此,分析方法方面所需的变化相对较少。当前的方法,特别是AACC批准的分析方法32 - 05(格拉米,2000年)、美国官方分析化学家协会的官方分析方法985.29(霍维茨,2000年a)或AACC 32 - 07(格拉米,2000年)、美国官方分析化学家协会991.43(霍维茨,2000年a)对于大多数食物来说仍将足够并继续使用。对于含有果聚糖(果糖的聚合物和低聚物、菊粉)、改性糊精和/或合成膳食纤维类似物等纤维的食物,需要少数额外的方法来量化其膳食纤维水平。