Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Dec;109(6):412-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) provides an alternative method of assessing pulmonary function to conventional spirometry.
To compare the sensitivities of IOS and spirometry in assessing bronchoconstriction to propranolol and bronchodilation with salbutamol.
A post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study was performed. Patients with mild-to-moderate persistent stable asthma taking 1,000 μg/day or less beclomethasone dipropionate equivalent received 10 or 20 mg of oral propranolol followed by histamine challenge, with recovery to nebulized salbutamol (5 mg). Spirometry and IOS were measured before and 2 hours after beta-blocker, post histamine, and 20 minutes post-salbutamol. Pre versus post percent change (95%CI) values were compared, and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated to assess the "signal to noise" of each test.
Thirteen participants (mean age, 34 years) completed the protocol. Eleven participants received 20 mg of propranolol; 2 received 10 mg, because this dose caused more than 10% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) on the test-dose algorithm. All IOS indices (R5, R5-R20, AX, RF) showed significant worsening of airways resistance or reactance to propranolol. FEV(1) but not FEF25-75 showed significant deterioration after beta-blocker (mean percent change, 4.6% and 6.2%). The magnitude of change was consistently higher for parameters of IOS, with the largest change being observed with R5 and RF (mean percent change, 30.8% and 39.4%). The SRMs for IOS outcomes were better than for spirometry. All measures of lung function showed significant bronchodilator response, with the best SRMs seen in R5 and RF.
IOS is a more sensitive response outcome than spirometry with respect to bronchoconstriction to oral propranolol and bronchodilatation after salbutamol in patients with mild to moderate asthma.
脉冲震荡(IOS)提供了一种评估肺功能的替代方法,与传统的肺活量测定法不同。
比较 IOS 和肺活量测定法在评估异丙肾上腺素诱导的支气管收缩和沙丁胺醇支气管扩张中的敏感性。
对一项随机安慰剂对照交叉研究进行了事后分析。接受 1000μg/天或更少倍氯米松二丙酸酯等效剂量的轻至中度持续性稳定哮喘患者接受 10 或 20mg 口服普萘洛尔,然后进行组胺挑战,并用沙丁胺醇(5mg)进行雾化恢复。在服用β受体阻滞剂前、2 小时后、组胺后和沙丁胺醇后 20 分钟进行肺量计和 IOS 测量。比较预与后百分比变化(95%CI)值,并计算标准化反应均值(SRM)以评估每种测试的“信号噪声”。
13 名参与者(平均年龄 34 岁)完成了方案。11 名参与者接受了 20mg 普萘洛尔;2 名参与者因在测试剂量算法中导致 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降超过 10%而接受了 10mg 普萘洛尔。所有 IOS 指标(R5、R5-R20、AX、RF)均显示气道阻力或电抗对异丙肾上腺素的显著恶化。FEV1 但不是 FEF25-75 在β受体阻滞剂后显示出明显恶化(平均百分比变化分别为 4.6%和 6.2%)。IOS 参数的变化幅度始终较高,R5 和 RF 的变化最大(平均百分比变化分别为 30.8%和 39.4%)。IOS 结果的 SRM 优于肺活量测定法。所有肺功能测量均显示出明显的支气管扩张反应,R5 和 RF 的最佳 SRM 最大。
在轻至中度哮喘患者中,与口服普萘洛尔引起的支气管收缩和沙丁胺醇支气管扩张相比,IOS 是一种比肺活量测定法更敏感的反应结果。