Sports Clinic, Hospital Mehiläinen, Tampere, Finland.
Clin Sports Med. 2013 Jan;32(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
According to the 20 prospective, randomized studies found from the English literature and included into this review, 6 studies (30%) did not find any significant differences in the clinical results between double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. However, 14 studies (70%) reported significantly better results with the double-bundle technique than with the single-bundle technique. In addition, none of the studies found that the single-bundle technique had better results in any of these evaluations than the double-bundle technique.
根据从英文文献中发现的 20 项前瞻性、随机研究，并纳入本综述，其中 6 项研究（30%）未发现双束与单束前交叉韧带重建术在临床结果方面存在任何显著差异。然而，14 项研究（70%）报告双束技术的结果明显优于单束技术。此外，没有一项研究发现单束技术在任何这些评估中都比双束技术具有更好的结果。
