Departament de Química Analítica, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013 Jan 23;48(1-2):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.10.028. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
The solubility vs. pH profiles of five ionizable drugs of different nature (a monoprotic acid, a monoprotic base, a diprotic base and two amphoteric compounds showing a zwitterionic species each one) have been determined through two different methodologies: the classical shake-flask (S-F) and the potentiometric Cheqsol methods using in both instances the appropriate Henderson-Hasselbalch (H-H) or derived relationships. The results obtained independently from both approaches are consistent. A critical revision about the influence of the electrolyte used as buffering agent in the S-F method on the obtained solubility values is also performed. Thus, some deviations of the experimental points with respect the H-H profiles can be attributed to specific interactions between the buffering electrolyte and the drug due to the hydrotrophic character of citric and lactic acids. In other cases, the observed deviations are independent of the buffers used since they are caused by the formation of new species such as drug aggregates (cefadroxil) or the precipitation of a salt from a cationic species of the analyzed compound (quetiapine).
五种不同性质的可电离药物(一种一元酸、一种一元碱、一种二元碱和两种两性化合物,每种化合物都表现出一种内盐形式)的溶解度与 pH 关系曲线通过两种不同的方法进行了测定:经典的摇瓶法(S-F)和使用适当的 Henderson-Hasselbalch(H-H)或衍生关系的电位 Cheqsol 方法。两种方法独立获得的结果是一致的。还对 S-F 方法中用作缓冲剂的电解质对获得的溶解度值的影响进行了批判性评估。因此,实验点相对于 H-H 曲线的一些偏差可以归因于缓冲电解质与药物之间的特定相互作用,这是由于柠檬酸和乳酸的亲水性。在其他情况下,观察到的偏差与所用的缓冲液无关,因为它们是由新物种的形成引起的,例如药物聚集体(头孢羟氨苄)或分析化合物的阳离子物种形成的盐的沉淀(喹硫平)。