EKOIZ-BERRILUR Research Consortium. Cell Biology & Environmental Toxicology Research Group, Zoology & Animal Cell Biology Department, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of the Basque Country, P.O. Box 644, E-48080 Bilbo, Basque Country, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:344-65. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.048. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
This is a pilot study for assessing soil ecosystem health in chronically polluted sites on the basis of a 3-tier approach (screening+scoring+understanding) designed to be cost-effective and scientifically based, and to provide straightforward advice and support to managers and stakeholders involved in environmental protection. For the initial screening (Tier 1), the use of a highly sensitive, low-cost biomarker such as neutral red uptake (NRU) in earthworm coelomocytes is proposed. In sites where an alteration in NRU has been established, the stress level may be further assessed by utilising a suite of low-cost and rapid biomarkers of effect integrated in an integrative biological response (IBR) index to obtain an objective (scored) assessment of the induced stress syndrome (Tier 2). The IBR/n index is based on the integration of biomarkers at different levels of biological organisation. Acyl-CoA oxidase activity (AOX), catalase activity (CAT), lipofuscin optical density (LOD%), NRU and the mean epithelial thickness (MET) have been used to calculate the IBR/n index. Biomarkers are determined in earthworms, Eisenia fetida, exposed ex situ to real soils (three mining sites and a reference) for 3, 10 and 17d. The 3d NRU (Tier 1) provided signal of stress. After 3d, PCA, based on the suite of biomarkers (Tier 2), discriminated reference and polluted sites according to toxicity profiles and at 17d, the most polluted site is segregated from less polluted and reference sites. Soils were classified as harmful, unhealthy (not apparently toxic) or healthy. Soils were investigated by microarray transcriptomics (Tier 3), to understand the causes (aetiology) and consequences (prognosis) of health impairment. Tier 3 discriminates, according to stress syndrome traits, soils that did not fall into the category of highly stressed and revealed the main agent causing toxicity at each site by identifying the toxicity mechanisms and biological responses.
这是一项基于三级方法(筛选+评分+理解)评估长期污染点土壤生态系统健康的初步研究,旨在具有成本效益和科学依据,并为参与环境保护的管理人员和利益相关者提供直接的建议和支持。对于初始筛选(第 1 层),建议使用高度敏感、低成本的生物标志物,如蚯蚓体腔细胞中的中性红摄取(NRU)。在已经确定 NRU 发生变化的地点,可以利用一系列低成本、快速的效应生物标志物,并将其整合到综合生物反应(IBR)指数中,进一步评估应激水平,以获得对诱导应激综合征的客观(评分)评估(第 2 层)。IBR/n 指数基于不同层次生物组织的生物标志物的整合。酰基辅酶 A 氧化酶活性(AOX)、过氧化氢酶活性(CAT)、脂褐素光密度(LOD%)、NRU 和平均上皮厚度(MET)已用于计算 IBR/n 指数。将赤子爱胜蚓(Eisenia fetida)暴露于真实土壤(三个采矿场和一个参照点)中 3、10 和 17d,在体外确定生物标志物。第 3 层的 3dNRU(第 1 层)提供了应激信号。第 3d 后,基于生物标志物(第 2 层)的 PCA 可以根据毒性特征区分参照点和污染点,而在第 17d,污染最严重的地点与污染程度较低的地点和参照点分开。土壤被归类为有害、不健康(无明显毒性)或健康。通过微阵列转录组学(第 3 层)调查土壤,以了解健康受损的原因(病因)和后果(预后)。第 3 层根据应激综合征特征进行区分,将不属于高度应激类别的土壤区分开来,并通过识别毒性机制和生物反应,揭示每个地点引起毒性的主要因素。