Department of Theoretical Biology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ecotoxicology. 2013 Mar;22(2):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10646-012-1022-0. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
The term "hormesis" is used to describe dose-response relationships where the response is reversed between low and high doses of a stressor (generally, stimulation at low doses and inhibition at high ones). A mechanistic explanation is needed to interpret the relevance of such responses, but there does not appear to be a single universal mechanism underlying hormesis. When the endpoint is a life-history trait such as growth or reproduction, a stimulation of the response comes with costs in terms of resources. Organisms have to obey the conservation laws for mass and energy; there is no such thing as a free lunch. Based on the principles of Dynamic Energy Budget theory, we introduce three categories of explanations for hormesis that obey the conservation laws: acquisition (i.e., increasing the input of energy into the individual), allocation (i.e., rearranging the energy flows over various traits) and medication (e.g., the stressor is an essential element or acts as a cure for a disease or infection). In this discussion paper, we illustrate these explanations with cases where they might apply, and elaborate on the potential consequences for field populations.
“适应”一词用于描述应激源的低剂量和高剂量之间反应(通常为低剂量刺激和高剂量抑制)发生逆转的剂量-反应关系。需要一种机制解释来解释这种反应的相关性,但似乎没有一个普遍适用的单一机制。当终点是生长或繁殖等生命史特征时,反应的刺激会带来资源方面的成本。生物体必须遵守质量和能量的守恒定律;天下没有免费的午餐。基于动态能量预算理论的原则,我们引入了三类适应符合守恒定律的解释:获取(即增加个体的能量输入)、分配(即重新安排各种特征的能量流)和药物治疗(例如,应激源是一种必需元素或作为疾病或感染的治疗方法)。在本讨论文件中,我们用可能适用的案例来说明这些解释,并详细阐述了对野外种群的潜在影响。