Suppr超能文献

昆虫头部的协同趋同现象的鉴定证实了古翅目。

The identification of concerted convergence in insect heads corroborates palaeoptera.

机构信息

Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Zentrum für molekulare Biodiversität, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2013 Mar;62(2):250-63. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys091. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

Abstract

The relationships of the 3 major clades of winged insects-Ephemeroptera, Odonata, and Neoptera-are still unclear. Many morphologists favor a clade Metapterygota (Odonata +Neoptera), but Chiastomyaria (Ephemeroptera + Neoptera) or Palaeoptera (Ephemeroptera +Odonata) has also been supported in some older and more recent studies. A possible explanation for the difficulties in resolving these relationships is concerted convergence-the convergent evolution of entire character complexes under the same or similar selective pressures. In this study, we analyze possible instances of this phenomenon in the context of head structures of Ephemeroptera, Odonata, and Neoptera. We apply a recently introduced formal approach to detect the occurrence of concerted convergence. We found that characters of the tentorium and mandibles in particular, but also some other head structures, have apparently not evolved independently, and thus can cause artifacts in tree reconstruction. Our subsequent analyses, which exclude character sets that may be affected by concerted convergence, corroborate the Palaeoptera concept. We show that the analysis of homoplasy and its influence on tree inference can be formally improved with important consequences for the identification of incompatibilities between data sets. Our results suggest that modified weighting (or exclusion of characters) in cases of formally identified correlated cliques of characters may improve morphology-based tree reconstruction.

摘要

翼状昆虫的 3 个主要分支——蜉蝣目、蜻蜓目和新翅目——之间的关系仍然不清楚。许多形态学家倾向于一个名为“Metapterygota”的分支(蜻蜓目+新翅目),但在一些较早和较新的研究中,也有支持 Chiastomyaria(蜉蝣目+新翅目)或 Palaeoptera(蜉蝣目+蜻蜓目)的观点。造成这些关系难以解决的一个可能解释是协同趋同——在相同或相似的选择压力下,整个特征复合体的趋同进化。在这项研究中,我们分析了蜉蝣目、蜻蜓目和新翅目头部结构中可能存在的这种现象。我们应用了一种新提出的形式化方法来检测协同趋同的发生。我们发现,特别是天幕和下颚的特征,但也有一些其他的头部结构,显然没有独立进化,因此可能会在树重建中产生假象。我们随后的分析排除了可能受到协同趋同影响的特征集,这进一步证实了 Palaeoptera 的概念。我们表明,同型性的分析及其对树推断的影响可以通过正式方法得到改进,这对数据集之间不兼容性的识别具有重要意义。我们的结果表明,在形式上确定的相关特征簇中,对修改后的加权(或排除特征)可能会改善基于形态的树重建。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验