Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Apr 1;85(5):1254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
To analyze the effect of primary Gleason (pG) grade among a large cohort of Gleason 7 prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).
From May 1989 to January 2011, 1190 Gleason 7 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with EBRT at a single institution. Of these patients, 613 had a Gleason 7 with a minimum of a sextant biopsy with nonfragmented cores and full biopsy core details available, including number of cores of cancer involved, percentage individual core involvement, location of disease, bilaterality, and presence of perineural invasion. Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 1-16 years). The prognostic implication for the following outcomes was analyzed: biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).
The 8-year bRFS rate for pG3 versus pG4 was 77.6% versus 61.3% (P<.0001), DMFS was 96.8% versus 84.3% (P<.0001), and PCSM was 3.7% versus 8.1% (P=.002). On multivariate analysis, pG4 predicted for significantly worse outcome in all parameters. Location of disease (apex, base, mid-gland), perineural involvement, maximum individual core involvement, and the number of Gleason 3+3, 3+4, or 4+3 cores did not predict for distant metastases.
Primary Gleason grade 4 independently predicts for worse bRFS, DMFS, and PCSM among Gleason 7 patients. Using complete core information can allow clinicians to utilize pG grade as a prognostic factor, despite not having the full pathologic details from a prostatectomy specimen. Future staging and risk grouping should investigate the incorporation of primary Gleason grade when complete biopsy core information is used.
分析在接受外束放射治疗(EBRT)的大量 Gleason 7 前列腺癌患者中,原发 Gleason 分级的影响。
1989 年 5 月至 2011 年 1 月,在一家机构中,对 1190 例局限性前列腺癌 Gleason 7 患者进行了 EBRT 治疗。这些患者中,有 613 例 Gleason 7 患者至少有 6 个半区的前列腺穿刺活检,有完整的活检核心详细信息,包括受累的核心数量、各核心受累的百分比、病变位置、双侧性和是否存在神经周围侵犯。中位随访时间为 6 年(范围,1-16 年)。分析以下结果的预后意义:生化无复发生存率(bRFS)、远处转移无复发生存率(DMFS)和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。
pG3 与 pG4 的 8 年 bRFS 率分别为 77.6%与 61.3%(P<.0001),DMFS 率分别为 96.8%与 84.3%(P<.0001),PCSM 率分别为 3.7%与 8.1%(P=.002)。多变量分析显示,pG4 预测所有参数的预后均显著较差。病变位置(尖部、底部、中部)、神经周围侵犯、最大单个核心受累以及 Gleason 3+3、3+4 或 4+3 核心的数量,均不能预测远处转移。
原发 Gleason 分级 4 独立预测 Gleason 7 患者的 bRFS、DMFS 和 PCSM 更差。使用完整的核心信息可以使临床医生将 pG 分级作为一个预后因素,尽管没有前列腺切除术标本的完整病理细节。未来的分期和风险分组应研究在使用完整的活检核心信息时纳入原发 Gleason 分级。