Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
Elevated gravitational force event rates are associated with the likelihood of a crash or near crash and provide an objective measure of risky driving. The purpose of this research is to examine the patterns over time of kinematic measures of risky driving among novice teenage drivers.
Driving data were collected from 42 newly licensed teenage drivers during the first 18 months of licensure. Data recording systems installed in participants' vehicles provided information on driving performance and driver characteristics. Latent class and logistic regression models were used to analyze trajectories of elevated gravitational-force (g-force) event rates, called kinematic risky driving, with respect to risk groups and associated factors.
Kinematic risky driving over the 18-month study period was best characterized as two classes, a higher-risk and a lower-risk class. The rate of kinematic risky driving during the first 6 months generally maintained over 18 months. Indeed, of those classified by latent class analysis as higher risk, 88.9%, 94.4% and 94.4% had average event rates above the median in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd 6-month periods, respectively, indicating substantial tracking over time. Friends' risky driving, friends' risky behavior, self-reported risky driving, and perceptions about risky driving and driving privileges were associated with trip-level rates of kinematic risky driving. However, none of these factors was associated with trip-level rates after stratifying by overall risk in a latent class model, although friend's risky driving was marginally significant.
Kinematic risky driving tended to track over time within the lower and higher risky driving groups. Self-reported risky driving and having risky friends were predictors of kinematic risky driving rates, but these variables did not explain the heterogeneity within higher and lower classes of risky drivers.
高重力事件率与撞车或险些撞车的可能性相关,并提供了衡量危险驾驶的客观指标。本研究的目的是检验新手青少年驾驶员在一段时间内的运动学危险驾驶行为模式。
在获得驾照后的头 18 个月内,从 42 名新获得驾照的青少年驾驶员那里收集了驾驶数据。安装在参与者车辆中的数据记录系统提供了有关驾驶表现和驾驶员特征的信息。使用潜在类别和逻辑回归模型分析了与风险组和相关因素有关的高重力(g-force)事件率(称为运动学危险驾驶)的轨迹。
在 18 个月的研究期间,运动学危险驾驶行为最好被描述为两个类别,即高风险和低风险类别。在头 6 个月内的运动学危险驾驶率通常在 18 个月内保持不变。实际上,在通过潜在类别分析归类为高风险的人群中,分别有 88.9%、94.4%和 94.4%的人在前、后 3 个 6 个月的平均事件率超过中位数,表明在整个研究期间存在实质性的跟踪。朋友的危险驾驶行为、朋友的危险行为、自我报告的危险驾驶行为以及对危险驾驶和驾驶特权的看法与运动学危险驾驶的行程水平率相关。然而,在潜在类别模型中对总体风险进行分层后,这些因素均与运动学危险驾驶的行程水平率无关,尽管朋友的危险驾驶行为有边缘显著。
在低风险和高风险驾驶组内,运动学危险驾驶倾向于随时间推移而保持稳定。自我报告的危险驾驶行为和有危险行为的朋友是运动学危险驾驶率的预测因素,但这些变量并不能解释高风险和低风险驾驶组内的异质性。