• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统在下颌骨骨折治疗中的对比评估——一项回顾性研究

Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.

作者信息

Kumar Ish, Singh Virender, Singh Anusha, Arora Varun, Bajaj Ajay

机构信息

JCD Dental College, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Sirsa, Haryana, India,

出版信息

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y. Epub 2012 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y
PMID:23184064
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of the 2.0-mm locking miniplate/screw system in comparison to the 2.0-mm nonlocking miniplate/screw system in mirror image mandibular fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective clinical trial was reviewed in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences Rohtak for a period of 30 months (June 2007 to December 2009). A total of 30 patient pairs with isolated identical mandibular fracture (single or multiple) having 88 fractures were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 complications that occurred represented 12.5% of the total. Six complications occurred at angle, three in the body and two at parasymphysis. Four complications occurred in the locking group and seven in the nonlocking group, with complication rates accounting for 9% and 16%, respectively. When comparing the overall complication rates according to plates used, the chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between the locking and nonlocking plates (p > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Mandible fractures treated with the 2.0-mm locking plates and the 2.0-mm nonlocking plates present similar short-term complication rates.

摘要

引言

本回顾性研究的目的是评估2.0毫米锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统与2.0毫米非锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统在下颌骨镜像骨折中的疗效。

材料与方法

在罗塔克市Pt. B.D. 夏尔马健康科学大学政府牙科学院口腔颌面外科进行了一项为期30个月(2007年6月至2009年12月)的回顾性临床试验。共分析了30对患有孤立性相同下颌骨骨折(单发或多发)且共有88处骨折的患者。

结果

共发生11例并发症,占总数的12.5%。6例并发症发生在角部,3例在体部,2例在颏孔旁。锁定组发生4例并发症,非锁定组发生7例,并发症发生率分别为9%和16%。根据所用钢板比较总体并发症发生率时,卡方检验显示锁定钢板和非锁定钢板之间无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。

讨论

用2.0毫米锁定钢板和2.0毫米非锁定钢板治疗的下颌骨骨折短期并发症发生率相似。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统在下颌骨骨折治疗中的对比评估——一项回顾性研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
2
Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.2.0mm 锁定板系统与 2.0mm 非锁定板系统治疗下颌骨骨折的对比评价:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;40(4):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.一项比较2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统治疗下颌骨骨折的荟萃分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Nov;25(6):2094-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001018.
4
Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统用于下颌角骨折固定的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Feb;19(4):552-6.
5
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.一项比较2.0毫米锁定钢板与2.0毫米标准钢板治疗下颌骨骨折的前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Nov;62(11):1392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.020.
6
Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.下颌角骨折的治疗方式。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;63(5):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.02.016.
7
Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.接骨板适应性是否会影响稳定性?锁定接骨板与非锁定接骨板的生物力学比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Nov;60(11):1319-26. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.35732.
8
Comparison of nonlocking plates and locking plates for intraarticular calcaneal fracture.非锁定钢板与锁定钢板治疗跟骨关节内骨折的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Dec;35(12):1298-302. doi: 10.1177/1071100714547520. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
9
A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.用于重建下颌骨联合/下颌骨旁联合骨折的接骨板技术的生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):2012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.013.
10
Management of Mandibular Fractures Using Locking and Nonlocking Miniplates.使用锁定和非锁定微型钢板治疗下颌骨骨折
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):448-452. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005128.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.三维接骨板与标准微型接骨板、拉力螺钉与微型接骨板、锁定接骨板与非锁定微型接骨板:下颌骨骨折的治疗,一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Dent Sci. 2019 Mar;14(1):66-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.04.004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of a new chair-side method for the harvest of mesenchymal stem cells in a patient with nonunion of a fracture of the atrophic mandible--a case report.一种用于采集萎缩性下颌骨骨折不愈合患者间充质干细胞的新型椅旁方法的应用——病例报告
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;37(3):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
2
Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional Synthes mandibular plates: A laboratory model.2.0锁定式与2.0传统Synthes下颌骨板的失效强度:一项实验室模型研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Oct;64(10):1475-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.027.
3
Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.
经口入路2.0毫米锁定微型钢板固定下颌骨骨折加1周颌间固定:一项前瞻性研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;63(12):1737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.08.022.
4
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.一项比较2.0毫米锁定钢板与2.0毫米标准钢板治疗下颌骨骨折的前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Nov;62(11):1392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.020.
5
New innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system.颅颌面固定的新创新:2.0锁定系统。
Keio J Med. 2003 Jun;52(2):120-7. doi: 10.2302/kjm.52.120.
6
Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.锁定重建钢板相关感染:一项回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;61(4):462-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50089.
7
Fixation of mandibular fractures with 2.0-mm miniplates: review of 191 cases.使用2.0毫米微型钢板固定下颌骨骨折:191例病例回顾
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;61(4):430-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50083.
8
Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.接骨板适应性是否会影响稳定性?锁定接骨板与非锁定接骨板的生物力学比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Nov;60(11):1319-26. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.35732.
9
Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery.使用2.0毫米锁定钢板/螺钉系统进行下颌骨骨折手术。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;60(6):642-5; discussion 645-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.33110.
10
Transoral 2.0-mm miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 2 weeks' maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.经口内 2.0 毫米微型钢板固定下颌骨骨折加 2 周颌间固定:一项前瞻性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Feb;60(2):167-70. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.29813.