• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统用于下颌角骨折固定的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Yang L, Patil P M

机构信息

Departement of Stomatology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, 82 Cuiyingmwen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City, Gansu Province, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Feb;19(4):552-6.

PMID:25753869
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This prospective randomized study evaluated the efficacy of a 2.0 mm locking plate/screw system compared with a 2.0-mm nonlocking plate/screw system in fixation of 60 isolated non-comminuted mandibular angle fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive a 2.0 mm locking plate (group A, n = 30) or 2.0 mm non-locking plate (group B, n = 30). All patients were followed up to 6 months postoperatively and evaluated for complications, occlusal stability and overall results of fixation.

RESULTS

Five complications occurred in the locking group and fourteen in the non-locking group with complication rates equalling 17% and 47% respectively. When comparing the overall results according to plates used, the χ² test showed a statistically significant difference between the locking and non-locking plates (p < 0.01). Fewer patients required IMF in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular angle fractures treated with 2.0 mm locking plates show greater stability and were associated with fewer complications than with 2.0 mm non-locking plates.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性随机研究评估了2.0毫米锁定钢板/螺钉系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板/螺钉系统在固定60例孤立性非粉碎性下颌角骨折中的疗效。

患者与方法

60例患者被随机分配接受2.0毫米锁定钢板(A组,n = 30)或2.0毫米非锁定钢板(B组,n = 30)。所有患者术后随访6个月,评估并发症、咬合稳定性和固定的总体效果。

结果

锁定组发生5例并发症,非锁定组发生14例并发症,并发症发生率分别为17%和47%。根据所用钢板比较总体结果时,χ²检验显示锁定钢板和非锁定钢板之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.01)。A组需要颌间固定的患者较少。

结论

与2.0毫米非锁定钢板相比,用2.0毫米锁定钢板治疗下颌角骨折显示出更高的稳定性,且并发症更少。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 2.0 mm locking plate system vs 2.0 mm non-locking plate system for mandibular angle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统用于下颌角骨折固定的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Feb;19(4):552-6.
2
Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.2.0mm 锁定板系统与 2.0mm 非锁定板系统治疗下颌骨骨折的对比评价:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;40(4):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
3
Comparative evaluation of 2.3 mm locking plate system vs conventional 2.0 mm non locking plate system for mandibular condyle fracture fixation: a seven year retrospective study.2.3mm 锁定板系统与传统 2.0mm 非锁定板系统治疗下颌骨髁突骨折固定的比较评价:一项七年回顾性研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(5):712-8.
4
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.一项比较2.0毫米锁定钢板与2.0毫米标准钢板治疗下颌骨骨折的前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Nov;62(11):1392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.04.020.
5
Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统在下颌骨骨折治疗中的对比评估——一项回顾性研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(4):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
6
Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.3D钢板与锁定钢板治疗下颌骨骨折的比较——一项临床研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;21(4):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0642-1. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.比较2毫米锁定钢板与2毫米标准钢板治疗下颌骨骨折时咬合力的前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):1995-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.014. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
8
A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.一项比较2.0毫米锁定钢板系统与2.0毫米非锁定钢板系统治疗下颌骨骨折的荟萃分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Nov;25(6):2094-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001018.
9
Use of a locking reconstruction bone plate/screw system for mandibular surgery.锁定重建接骨板/螺钉系统在下颌骨手术中的应用。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Nov;56(11):1261-5. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90605-x.
10
Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.锁定重建钢板相关感染:一项回顾性研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;61(4):462-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50089.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications following miniplate insertion in maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review.颌面骨折微型钢板内固定术后并发症:一项系统评价
F1000Res. 2025 Mar 6;13:1507. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159017.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Biomechanical analysis of a novel screw system with a variable locking angle in mandible angle fractures.一种新型可变锁定角度螺钉系统在下颌角骨折中的生物力学分析
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023 Nov;61(11):2951-2961. doi: 10.1007/s11517-023-02895-y. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Comparison of a 2.0-mm locking system with conventional 2.0- and 2.4-mm systems in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.
2.0毫米锁定系统与传统2.0毫米和2.4毫米系统治疗下颌骨骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;21(3):327-334. doi: 10.1007/s10006-017-0636-z. Epub 2017 Jun 12.